Ancestors

Toot

Written by rutrum@lm.paradisus.day on 2024-10-08 at 01:54

What's your favorite FOSS tools for image editing?

https://lm.paradisus.day/post/316745

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rutrum@lm.paradisus.day

Descendants

Written by rutrum@lm.paradisus.day on 2024-10-08 at 02:03

I’ve been meaning to get into some image generation type things too. The best self hosted tool I know of is InvokeAI. I’m sure there could be a whole post (or other community) about image generation tools.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rutrum@lm.paradisus.day

Written by graycube@lemmy.world on 2024-10-08 at 01:56

I often use imagemagick (cli) for cropping, rotating, resizing, etc.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from graycube@lemmy.world

Written by tetris11@lemmy.ml on 2024-10-08 at 10:24

For painting from the command line, I use set to replace data at given offsets

It requires decoding the jpeg in my head to get the image offsets, but the pragmatism is unbeatable.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tetris11@lemmy.ml

Written by fool@programming.dev on 2024-10-09 at 06:50

Lmao, what?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fool@programming.dev

Written by tetris11@lemmy.ml on 2024-10-09 at 08:10

You do the decomposition in your head to get the raw image, replace pixels, and then recompose the jpeg, taking note of the diff. That diff is what you then swap into the original with sed.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tetris11@lemmy.ml

Written by merde alors on 2024-10-08 at 02:10

☞ !stable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.com

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from merde@sh.itjust.works

Written by Otter on 2024-10-08 at 02:29

I’d be interested in another post on that topic :)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from otter@lemmy.ca

Written by dinckel on 2024-10-08 at 02:04

I use Krita every time i need to edit something. It’s more than good enough for me

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dinckelman@lemmy.world

Written by AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world on 2024-10-08 at 02:24

You can install and run Stable Diffusion locally (Pinokio is a versatile installer that can run SD and many other open-source AI tools as well). With SD you can build your own upscalers that are better than Upscayl, and do things like background removal too (in addition to prompt-based generation and such).

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world

Written by Otter on 2024-10-08 at 02:33

Lots of great suggestions here already

I haven’t seen mobile editing mentioned yet:

ImageToolbox for a very good Android image editing tool

Fossify Gallery for some quick editing tools built into the gallery

While not directly for editing, Tidy on android allows for AI search locally

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from otter@lemmy.ca

Written by Disonantezko@lemmy.sdf.org on 2024-10-08 at 17:57

I prefer:

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Disonantezko@lemmy.sdf.org

Written by TheForvalaka on 2024-10-08 at 03:11

Image removal and AI tools have an overlap, for sure. RemBG is pretty effective, which runs in many of the environments with Stable Diffusion. Bria is a recent improved model for RemBG, which I’ve had some good success with. It’s not perfect, but it cuts out a lot of the work.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from IanM32@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Written by Nora on 2024-10-08 at 03:17

Pinta.

It’s like a Linux version of Paint.net

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from crazyminner@lemmy.ml

Written by Dymonika@beehaw.org on 2024-10-14 at 07:25

I don’t think its 3D rotation capabilities are as good, though.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Dymonika@beehaw.org

Written by thingsiplay@beehaw.org on 2024-10-08 at 04:53

GIMP, Inkscape, Krita, Upscayl, ImageMagick, Background remover AI

GIMP and Inkscape. I use GIMP for all kind of image editing off course, and use Inkscape to create logos and icons. Both great tools. I wish GIMP had a few basic shape tools too and non destructive editing. Soon we get non destructive editing in early future, but basic shape tools will be added in a later future.

I have Krita installed too, but for general purpose editing and want to replace GIMP with it. Because Krita adresses some issues I have with GIMP, but it does not feel good in editing to me. Maybe I’m just not used to it, even after years of trying over and over again. It has extensive vector layers and non destructive editing, great, but the font tool sucks.

I also have Upscayl installed since a while, to play around with upscaling images. First it was nice, but over time I’m no longer happy with it. Especially with higher end resolutions, the image contain unnatural and wrong parts that stand out.

For background removal I use GIMP. Its a manual step with the integrated background removal tool, but you have to mask areas as foreground and background. If the image is not low quality and the boundaries are not too fuzzy, then it works well “sometimes”. But I assume you ask for a more easy to use and more automated tool, preferably an AI tool right? I have such a tool bookmarked, its a browser online tool, but never used it so far: Background remover AI

As other tools, I use commandline converter and editor ImageMagick! Its nice to be able to script simple stuff and bulk edit them (20 thousand and more in a few minutes), such as crops from screenshots. Or at work I could create simple text based images out of a text file (it was for my shop back then… long time ago :-( ).

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from thingsiplay@beehaw.org

Written by dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 2024-10-08 at 07:35

I heard about Graphite the other day. It’s nowhere near finished, but very promising. Hopefully, it becomes the FOSS of Photopea.

editor.graphite.rs

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Written by Eugenia on 2024-10-08 at 17:53

That’s more of an inkscape replacement than a gimp/photoshop one. It’s mostly about vectors, not raster images.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from eugenia@lemmy.ml

Written by Psyhackological on 2024-10-08 at 21:30

It tries to do both.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Psyhackological@lemmy.ml

Written by wargreymon@sh.itjust.works on 2024-10-08 at 07:41

I paid 700 for Adobe Photoshop each month, and pay extra 10 each time to unlock when I open the program.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wargreymon@sh.itjust.works

Written by CarrotsHaveEars on 2024-10-08 at 14:46

I made a very generous donation to Krita a week ago, which was $10. They seemed happy about it.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml

Written by muhyb@programming.dev on 2024-10-08 at 09:23

GIMP for most general stuff, Krita for painting and 2D animation, Aseprite for pixel everything.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from muhyb@programming.dev

Written by tetris11@lemmy.ml on 2024-10-08 at 10:20

Aseprite

Software that should have been around for the Amiga

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tetris11@lemmy.ml

Written by rutrum@lm.paradisus.day on 2024-10-08 at 13:16

I forgot about Asesprite! Thats a great tool.

Aseprite was originally licensed under GPL but later made propretary. The fork of the last GPL version is called Libresprite but it doesnt have much activity, I dont think.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rutrum@lm.paradisus.day

Written by muhyb@programming.dev on 2024-10-08 at 13:32

Well, it still is OSS and one can still compile from source code. Or you can buy your binary. Never heard of Libresprite but looks fine if you absolutely want FOSS.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from muhyb@programming.dev

Written by Nailbar on 2024-10-08 at 20:33

Krita has tools for 2D animation? I need to look into that.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nailbar@sopuli.xyz

Written by paf@jlai.lu on 2024-10-08 at 10:02

I have used darktable, but doesn’t seem to fill your need as it is more a lightroom replacement than Photoshop

www.darktable.org

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from paf@jlai.lu

Written by Disonantezko@lemmy.sdf.org on 2024-10-08 at 15:12

With ChaiNNer you can remove background, upscale (local), it’s a lot more flexible and compatible with models than Upscayl, also a little bit more complex (node based, not as complex as comfyUI). You can upscale an image with a face model and use other model for everything else in the same image.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Disonantezko@lemmy.sdf.org

Written by pedroapero@lemmy.ml on 2024-10-08 at 16:14

I use Gthumb for simple edits (croping, resizing, rotating…).

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pedroapero@lemmy.ml

Written by marcie (she/her) on 2024-10-08 at 16:26

Krita, I use it for everything, I hate gimp, it feels so bad

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from marcie@lemmy.ml

Written by Crozekiel@lemmy.zip on 2024-10-08 at 16:36

I second Krita. I’ve used gimp for years but recently tried Krita and now I rarely open gimp anymore on purpose.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Crozekiel@lemmy.zip

Written by marcie (she/her) on 2024-10-08 at 17:20

My biggest complaints with krita are around it not being easy to align objects and the text tool could use some love. Other than that, it feels like a great photoshop replacement

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from marcie@lemmy.ml

Written by Crozekiel@lemmy.zip on 2024-10-08 at 19:27

I didn’t think either were noticeably worse than in gimp for my use, but you might be comparing to a higher bar than (or your use is more intricate than mine), lol.

I have quite liked the ability to turn on snapping for lining things up, and managed recently to freehand a very nearly perfect hexagon with it’s help… But I really wish there were some options for drawing polygons though… Even mspaint has the option to draw some basic shapes like stars and arrows and various polygons with just click and drag.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Crozekiel@lemmy.zip

Written by jlow (he/him) on 2024-10-08 at 21:24

Yeah, text tool is just awful but I feel like I heard that they’re working on an update quite some time ago …

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jlow@beehaw.org

Written by marcie (she/her) on 2024-10-08 at 17:23

In general I feel like its probably KDE’s best software package outside of its DE. Know of any other super good KDE apps?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from marcie@lemmy.ml

Written by IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org on 2024-10-08 at 18:34

Okular is pretty great, I can’t find a package that does good annotation of PDFs built on GTK.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org

Written by Crozekiel@lemmy.zip on 2024-10-08 at 19:30

I use Okular all the time. I am so dense I didn’t even realize Krita and Okular were both developed by KDE…

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Crozekiel@lemmy.zip

Written by IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org on 2024-10-08 at 22:53

No worries, it’s pretty hard to keep track when their naming scheme is “it has a K in it”…

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org

Written by uniquethrowagay@feddit.org on 2024-10-09 at 09:35

Except for the also outstanding KDE Connect which could just be called Konnect.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from uniquethrowagay@feddit.org

Written by Crozekiel@lemmy.zip on 2024-10-09 at 18:17

Ouf, :(

I did say I was dense… lol

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Crozekiel@lemmy.zip

Written by Hemingways_Shotgun on 2024-10-09 at 06:32

Okular is great. Kate is amazing. Kdenlive is BY FAR the most advanced FOSS video editor. I’d easily put Kdenlive above Krita, but that’s because of my particular use case.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Adderbox76@lemmy.ca

Written by Iceblade on 2024-10-08 at 20:15

Krita is nice overall, but I have some minor gripes with certain tools behaving unintuitively. May just be because I’m used to GIMP, but some simple stuff such as cropping a layer is not at all convenient.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Iceblade02@lemmy.world

Written by 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 on 2024-10-10 at 02:49

Krita looks more like a drawing and animation solution, whereas GIMP is an editing / manipulation solution. Or can Krita be used as an editor, too? I’m going to download later and give it a shot, but just wanted your opinion so I have better expectations.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub

Written by marcie (she/her) on 2024-10-10 at 07:27

i use it as an editor even though thats not really its use case. i just feel like gimp is far too clunky, it just feels “off” to me in comparison to photoshop

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from marcie@lemmy.ml

Written by 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 on 2024-10-10 at 21:59

That makes sense. Thanks for the input!

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub

Written by ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ on 2024-10-08 at 17:41

GIMP, but mostly because I’m already used to it. I keep meaning to give Krita a go, but just haven’t had the time and energy to figure out how to do all the things I already know how to do with GIMP using it.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from yogthos@lemmy.ml

Written by noughtnaut on 2024-10-08 at 19:46

I’m not an artist, I just need the occasional hack job or screenshot annotation.

I loved the simple programs (this love stems from all the way back to MacPaint v1.0) and MS Paint has largely been ok for me apart from its lack of png support and only 90° rotations.

On Linux, Pinta has been fantastic but these last few years it got increasingly more crashy, to the point where it will now consistently crash within 10 seconds or two clicks, regardless of Linux distro / laptop/pc / version of Pinta. (insert “whyyyyy” meme here)

I’ve tried Krita, but it’s simply too much. Don’t even want to try installing Gimp. I am sad.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from noughtnaut@lemmy.world

Written by achille225@jlai.lu on 2024-10-09 at 12:23

I can’t recommend Spectacle enough in that case : it does just about what you would expect, screenshots and simple editing.

Very convenient, it’s the default in KDE

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from achille225@jlai.lu

Written by Danitos@reddthat.com on 2024-10-08 at 20:55

A very useful tip for technical images (i.e., lab report/research): export whatever graph you created as .svg, and do some prettifying touches in InkScape. It is faaaar easier than doing it in code.

Also, always export the .svg, even if you’re not gonna use it. You never know when you want to do a very small correction, and it will save you quite some time.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Danitos@reddthat.com

Written by rutrum@lm.paradisus.day on 2024-10-09 at 15:30

I love use tools like mermaid or plantuml. But Ive always faught with formatting (or gave up) instead of editing after the fact. Great idea?

In the same vein, I use draw.io to make architecture diagrams and flow charts.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rutrum@lm.paradisus.day

Written by bonegakrejg@lemmy.ml on 2024-10-08 at 21:28

I used to use GIMP, but Krita has gotten advanced enough to where it can replace it for most things (at least that I would use it for).

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bonegakrejg@lemmy.ml

Written by FarraigePlaisteach on 2024-10-09 at 19:31

Does that include raster editing? I liked KritasUI but I’m not an artist.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world

Written by bonegakrejg@lemmy.ml on 2024-10-14 at 04:25

That is most of what it does unless I’m misunderstanding what you mean. It can do general image manipulation stuff.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bonegakrejg@lemmy.ml

Written by FarraigePlaisteach on 2024-10-14 at 09:54

Thanks. I might check it out again. It’s been over a decade since I’ve used it.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world

Written by toastal@lemmy.ml on 2024-10-09 at 05:27

Image is a broad word. I would say in order of usage per year it would be Darktable, Inkscape, Hugin, GIMP, Krita… but these obviously serve different purposes.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from toastal@lemmy.ml

Written by Owl on 2024-10-09 at 05:47

Darktable for raw image processing

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz

Written by lengau@midwest.social on 2024-10-09 at 11:09

I use kolourpaint to make memes

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lengau@midwest.social

Written by sntx@lemm.ee on 2024-10-09 at 12:19

dd if=/dev/zero of=image.png bs=1k count=1024 conv=notrunc

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from sntx@lemm.ee

Written by Daniel Quinn on 2024-10-09 at 18:54

GIMP is alright. Mostly I stick to it because Krita’s dependency on QT means it looks and works differently from everything else in my GNOME environment.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from danielquinn@lemmy.ca

Written by youmaynotknow on 2024-10-09 at 22:44

My daughter and my sister 🤣🤣. I have 0 art in my body, so they do all that for me. I could say I have a great AI driven FOSS process in place, lol.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jjlinux@lemmy.ml

Written by IsusRamzy@lemmy.ml on 2024-10-12 at 15:13

remove backgrounds? i think you could find a krita plugin for it, or just use an online website / huggingface space.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from IsusRamzy@lemmy.ml

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/thread/113269307124711146
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
939.156488 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
26.542897 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).