@jeanas @tito
The attribution about the discovery of the λ-calculus definition of predecessor in my realizability notes is mistaken (and now it has found its way into https://jean.abou-samra.fr/blog/science-amusante): it was Stephen Klenee, not Alfred Tarski, as documented at the bottom of page 56 of
Stephen C. Klene: Origins of Recursive Function Theory, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Jan.-Mar. 1981, pp. 52-67, vol. 3, https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MAHC.1981.10004
Let me fix the notes right away.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from andrejbauer@mathstodon.xyz
@andrejbauer @jeanas @tito
I thought everybody knew that Kleene solved this problem while he was in the dentist.
Edit. See e.g. https://iep.utm.edu/lambda-calculi/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from MartinEscardo@mathstodon.xyz
@andrejbauer @jeanas @tito
(This was not a joke, by the way.)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from MartinEscardo@mathstodon.xyz
@MartinEscardo @jeanas @tito Yes, I thought it was general knowledge too, so imagine my shock when it turned out I confused Kleene and Tarski in my notes, and the confusion started propagating around the internet.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from andrejbauer@mathstodon.xyz This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini