Is it just me? Anytime I see AI generated images used in articles or web pages I immediately think “lazy” Just use free stock art at least.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from thedarktangent@defcon.social
@thedarktangent When compared to free stock images, I don't see the difference. If one works better than the other for some use case, then no judgement from me. As long as it's good quality anyway - both low quality stock and genai are sad.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from viraptor@cyberplace.social
@viraptor But with stock art at least someone had to review multiple (real)pictures and pick the one they thought fit instead of typing "Cyberspace network" at the prompt and using whatever resulted. It's like the bare minimum effort please.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from thedarktangent@defcon.social
@thedarktangent I'm not sure those assumptions are safe. Someone could search for "cyberspace network free stock" and choose the first one, or they could spend a lot of time generating just the right thing using their specific fine tuned model and spending extra time to in-paint the areas which needed correcting. From the outside we won't know which one happened, unless one falls into the "objectively bad" category.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from viraptor@cyberplace.social
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).