Ancestors

Toot

Written by ALostInquirer@lemm.ee on 2024-09-24 at 18:31

Is there a setting for instances to disable voting from Local or All feeds?

https://lemm.ee/post/43158174

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ALostInquirer@lemm.ee

Descendants

Written by Andrew on 2024-09-24 at 18:50

I think lemmynsfw stopped people who weren't subscribed to a community from voting in it (because their communities for gay people were getting a lot of downvotes from All). If that's what you mean. I think it was a hack rather than a setting though (my info might be out of date)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from andrew_s@piefed.social

Written by ALostInquirer@lemm.ee on 2024-09-24 at 18:56

Yeah, that’s along the lines of what I’m asking about, albeit instead of a subscription check more like, I think, however the instances disabling/removing downvoting have done so, but adjusting the scope strictly to the Local or All views.

Another approach to addressing outsider/passive voting behaviors.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ALostInquirer@lemm.ee

Written by Andrew on 2024-09-24 at 19:07

I don't think that would be possible. The API is only sending "post_id" and "score" for votes, so the backend has no info on what feed a user used to send it. An instance could modify their official frontend to hide the ability to downvote from Local and All but they couldn't do anything about people using different frontends (e.g. all the various phone apps)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from andrew_s@piefed.social

Written by ALostInquirer@lemm.ee on 2024-09-24 at 19:14

Interesting, thanks! It sounds like you could hide the ability to vote either way then on an instance’s frontend, but as you say, it wouldn’t really do much to address voting activity from either other frontends or instances.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ALostInquirer@lemm.ee

Written by maegul (he/they) on 2024-09-24 at 21:16

It’s definitely an interesting and relevant idea I think! A major flaw here is the lack of ability for communities to establish themselves as discrete spaces desperate from the doomscrolling crowd.

A problem with the fediverse on the whole IMO, as community building is IMO what it should be focusing on.

Generally decentralisation makes things like this difficult, AFAIU. Lemmy has things like private and local only communities in the works that will get you there. But then discovery becomes a problem which probably requires some additional features too.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from maegul@lemmy.ml

Written by Die4Ever@programming.dev on 2024-09-25 at 13:48

I guess communities should have an easy way to hide themselves from Local/All feeds

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Die4Ever@programming.dev

Written by maegul (he/they) on 2024-09-25 at 20:23

Yea. Even nicer if it could be adjusted on a post-by-post basis (however viable that is).

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from maegul@lemmy.ml

Written by Dessalines on 2024-09-24 at 21:22

We’re adding more fine-grained voting settings, but it’s a few releases away.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dessalines@lemmy.ml

Written by ALostInquirer@lemm.ee on 2024-09-24 at 21:40

Thanks for the heads-up on this! Didn’t realize that was in the works

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ALostInquirer@lemm.ee