𝐑𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐢𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐬
𝖤𝗆𝗆𝖺 𝖩𝖺𝖼𝗈𝖻𝗌 - 𝖥𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖳𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌
Remember the good old days? When office corridors buzzed with the sound of ideas bouncing between senior executives and junior recruits? And the kitchens! New products conceived in the time it took for the kettle to boil. Not to mention all that learning. In the past, a new starter only had to sit within five yards of an experienced colleague to absorb the entire contents of their brain.
Such pre-pandemic nostalgia infused the vision laid out last week by Andy Jassy, chief executive of retailer Amazon, who ordered a full-time return to the office (RTO). In a memo, he said the move would make it easier for staff to “learn, model, practice”. It would also “strengthen our culture” while making things like brainstorming “simpler and more effective”.
https://ft.pressreader.com/article/281844354034491
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from andytiedye@sfba.social
I don’t want to rain on anyone’s rosehued parade. But in ancient times — five years ago — employees would also bitch about silos, poor training and productivity. Remember offices on Fridays? No, me neither. about off-site meetings because headquarters was too stultifying to produce new ideas? Sadly, yes.
Of course, coming together in the workplace can spur connections, innovation and learning. But let’s not get carried away. The office is not the solution to every workplace problem.
However, some seem to think it is — even if that view is not backed up by evidence. In her new book, Over Work, Brigid Schulte describes a leadership “echo chamber”. One expert tells her their team “was actually more productive” when working flexibly “not just in terms of hours worked, but literally in output”. They can readily demonstrate this to the CEO, but “can’t get them to listen because instead they’re listening to their fellow CEOs”. …
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from andytiedye@sfba.social
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).