Introducing "How Equitable Is It?": a tool to assess #equity in #ScholComm models on key criteria, including #OpenAccess, pricing transparency, #OpenResearch.
Developed by the beyond article-based charges working group, chaired by @cOAlitionS_OA, Jisc, @PLOS
π https://www.coalition-s.org/new-tool-to-assess-equity-in-scholarly-communication-models
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cOAlitionS_OA@fediscience.org
Launched today at #OASPA2024, the "How Equitable Is It?" tool will enable institutions, consortia, funders & publishers to assess to what extent a publishing model facilitates equitable participation in knowledge sharing.
π§ͺ It's in beta - try it out!
π https://coalitions.typeform.com/Equity-Tool
[#]Equity
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cOAlitionS_OA@fediscience.org
The "How Equitable Is It?" tool results from robust discussions within the "Beyond article-based charges" Working Group.
The group's strength lies in diverse stakeholder views: funders, librarians & publishers, as Roheena Anand @PLOS notes.
Huge πto all!
β‘ https://www.coalition-s.org/beyond-article-based-charges-working-group-established/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cOAlitionS_OA@fediscience.org
Are you attending #OASPA2024 in Lisbon? Visit the poster area to learn more about the "How Equitable Is It?" tool.
Everyone else, please try the tool at π₯οΈ coalitions.typeform.com/Equity-Tool & share your feedback by 28th October via π coalitions.typeform.com/Equity-Feedback.
#EquitablePublishing
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cOAlitionS_OA@fediscience.org This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini