Reminder: seeders, please seed on I2P
https://infosec.pub/post/17541103
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Findmysec@infosec.pub
A proper VPN provider is sufficient to protect against this though. If you, as a Swedish citizen, weren’t already using a VPN, you were being an idiot.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
A VPN company can easily give up your details to the police who are now actively going after citizens. VPNs are not enough anymore.
Is there a problem with I2P adoption? I’m sensing a massive lack of interest from this thread
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Findmysec@infosec.pub
A good VPN won’t have any details to hand over that will convict you, even if they wanted to (e.g. mullvad), so they most definitely are enough.
And police are not going after citizens, rights holder are (like they always have been) by using ISPs.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
VPNs log your IP. And Mullvad doesn’t allow port-forwarding, which means you can’t seed.
Being a node for traffic doesn’t mean it can be linked to your identity, because everything is encrypted and metadata is scrambled. But if you think like that I suppose you aren’t very interested in running TOR relays or exits either.
I can’t convince you. I only hope that people start seeing the need for it and begin reading the documentation to see its strengths
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Findmysec@infosec.pub
I use Mulvad, and seeding seems to work for me. Am I missing something?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tate@lemmy.sdf.org
That shouldn’t be possible in theory unless I don’t know it well enough. Care to provide a screenshot?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini