The post on Zero Dependencies by @timbray reminded me of an older post by Joe Armstrong:
Why I often implement things from scratch
http://armstrongonsoftware.blogspot.com/2006/09/why-i-often-implement-things-from.html
"If you have the right tools it's often quicker to implement something from scratch than going to all the trouble of downloading compiling and installing something that somebody else has written."
Tim's post: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2024/09/04/0dependencies
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hectorjcorrea@mastodon.social
@hectorjcorrea@mastodon.socia
Heh, or, assuming an appropriate license, just copy in a function or two from another project, rather than taking a dependency on the whole thing.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from timbray@cosocial.ca
@hectorjcorrea @timbray The first time is not code reuse, it's just use. You need more than one to get the "re". And you're pulling in all of it, not just the part you used.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from landley@mstdn.jp This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini