I have a daily cron job that runs a short C program to put a random quotation into my mail signature.
Today that cron job failed, and I started debugging the program, at which point I found:
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bwh@tech.lgbt
@bwh That's almost certainly an upstream bug, would you mind re-reporting it to libc-alpha@sourceware.org ? I know at least one person who reads that list cares about binary compat with programs compiled that long ago. Please attach the actual binary if possible.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from zwol@hackers.town
@zwol I've now done that, thank you!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bwh@tech.lgbt
@bwh I regret that I forgot about their bugzilla and therefore you immediately got asked to refile the bug again.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from zwol@hackers.town
@zwol @bwh I know it feels lame to ask for someone to file a bug, but we use bugs for all sorts of tracking, de-duplication, CVE assignment, etc. So we often like to have a bug filed and collect data. In the meantime the issue has been deduced, it was a missing case in the compat for doubly-linked list handling for older streams https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/CAMe9rOonyQsKdEse6VwCAbRD+J6U6fxuwtmQs3haYi1_6Euuow@mail.gmail.com/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from codonell@fosstodon.org
@codonell I'm not objecting to the use of a bug tracker by the glibc project, I'm annoyed with myself for forgetting that there was one and thus making @bwh do an extra step
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from zwol@hackers.town
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).