(Emphasis added)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jaywilliams@bsd.network
I believe this 100%, and have seen it happen time and time again. If we ever want to get to a more sustainable future, we've got to get away from these single use products.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jaywilliams@bsd.network
@jaywilliams It's 100% true. What you buy isn't the device, it's the limited (!) license to use it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from peter_slwk@mastodon.social
@jaywilliams I suspect this involves doing away with capitalism.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lykso@tiny.tilde.website
@lykso I'm of the opinion any unconstrained economic system does more harm than good, regardless of it's ideology.
Rater than doing away with capitalism entirely, I think a better solution would be to pass laws and regulations which would incentivize business to build more reusable and recyclable products, and they'll naturally follow the route maximize their profits.
Obviously for something like that to work in the real world, you'd have to have to have some means of validating that the products are actually reusable/recyclable and not just green-washed. Not exactly and easy feat to pull off, but there's enough smart people out there (I hope!) that could figure it out.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jaywilliams@bsd.network
@lykso On that same front, I see the whole "right to repair" movement as a good step in that direction.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jaywilliams@bsd.network
@jaywilliams I likewise tend to think that quests for ideological purity are wrong-headed. Idealism ignores material conditions and the necessary awkwardness of transitional states and the ambiguity inherent in necessarily always being somewhat wrong. But I tend to think that any system which does not consistently subordinate the profit motive to democratic control (i.e., any system that is not some version of socialism) will eventually find itself captured by rent-seeking profit-maximizers. 1/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lykso@tiny.tilde.website
@jaywilliams
There are two kinds of plastics, plastics that can be recycled to use again, and plastics that cannot be recycled.
Make non-recycleable plastics a crime. Tax wealth to clean up old plastic.
Running away from the costs of your enterprise is a moral and ethical crime, and must become a legal crime.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kevinrns@mstdn.social
@jaywilliams ma perché se l'acqua non c'è la papera non galleggia perché ?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from setz5@mastodon.social
@jaywilliams the bleakness of the idea that you needed a subscription in the first place to prevent ads interrupting pictures of your family is a pretty stark starting point, removing the ability to even pay for that subscription is even bleaker.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ReverendMoose@mas.to
@jaywilliams @cammerman I would argue that you don‘t need to own most of your stuff. Quite the contrary, the less you own the better. On the other hand, the mentioned case is the worst of two worlds. You own the physical hardware but it‘s useless due to the software/service which you can‘t rent anymore.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from afuerstenau@troet.cafe
@jaywilliams really you should be able to mess and determine with what's installed on there. Ideally it's mainline linux.
It could share a Syncthing folder, and just show that. Could even have a settings file on there.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jasper@mastodon.nl
@jasper that’s not a bad idea at all, and would require zero subscriptions or fees. I use syncthing for my files, why not use them for a slideshow?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jaywilliams@bsd.network
@jaywilliams Where the world will go (end ?) when the connections to the "AI servers" for one reason or another will get ( temporary ?) broken ??
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from gilesgoat@toot.wales
@jaywilliams
In wich catechory falls BMW that wants you to subscribe a monthly fee to use the seat heater in the car that you bought?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from WvOostveen@mstdn.social
@WvOostveen I’d argue you don’t own the seat heater at all, even though you “bought” it and pay for the gas to power it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jaywilliams@bsd.network
@jaywilliams also thé case of Remarkable note taking devise...
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from erverd@sciences.re This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini