Ancestors

Toot

Written by testman@lemmy.ml on 2024-08-21 at 12:59

De-Google Your Life - Part 2: Ad-Free YouTube!

https://lemmy.ml/post/19407560

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from testman@lemmy.ml

Descendants

Written by viking@infosec.pub on 2024-08-21 at 13:18

As long as you are still sourcing the content from youtube, you’re not really de-googled.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from viking@infosec.pub

Written by WhyFlip@lemmy.world on 2024-08-21 at 13:25

This

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from WhyFlip@lemmy.world

Written by Voyajer@lemmy.world on 2024-08-21 at 13:36

The video is available on floatplane as well if you want to watch not on YouTube/invideous

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Voyajer@lemmy.world

Written by Handles on 2024-08-21 at 13:37

Sure, but with the critical mass of videos on Youtube, and the sheer impossibility of consensually mirroring them all on another platform, accessing YT videos with Invidious or Newpipe is at least safer than wading unprotected onto Google’s platforms.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from halm@leminal.space

Written by Pherenike on 2024-08-21 at 21:51

Yeah it’s practically impossible to completely escape GAFAM unless we renounce ‘digital life’ or make a humongous effort or whatever. It’s about reducing / minimizing the amount of shit they know about us, not being the coolest most degoogled guy in the room. I can’t afford to quit my job just because they make me use Microsoft Authenticator. So yeah essentially it’s better to use Newpipe than Youtube, what a great thing that some dude or dudette decided to develop it for free, Peertube? Even better, yay options, end of story.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Pherenike@lemmy.ml

Written by Zwiebel@feddit.org on 2024-08-21 at 22:22

Baby steps.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Zwiebel@feddit.org

Written by doodledup@lemmy.world on 2024-08-21 at 13:27

youtu.be/GsjHMzGl-VY?feature=shared

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from doodledup@lemmy.world

Written by Zwiebel@feddit.org on 2024-08-21 at 22:16

You can remove the ?feature= part youtu.be/GsjHMzGl-VY

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Zwiebel@feddit.org

Written by doodledup@lemmy.world on 2024-08-21 at 13:51

Doesn’t even mention Firefox.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from doodledup@lemmy.world

Written by noodlejetski@lemm.ee on 2024-08-21 at 13:53

I wonder if the title implies that there are some other videos in the series, perhaps with a number lower than 2?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from noodlejetski@lemm.ee

Written by Zwiebel@feddit.org on 2024-08-21 at 22:12

This is part two. Browsers were discussed in part one.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Zwiebel@feddit.org

Written by noodlejetski@lemm.ee on 2024-08-21 at 13:54

some choices mentioned there are questionable (PIA), some good solutions are omitted (Organic Maps), but otherwise it’s… surpringly not horrible.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from noodlejetski@lemm.ee

Written by eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de on 2024-08-21 at 14:07

What’s the issue with PIA? I’ve used it for quite a while and am quite happy with it.

The choice that surprised me was them recommending 1Password ($40/year) over Bitwarden ($10/year, solid free plan).

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de

Written by noodlejetski@lemm.ee on 2024-08-21 at 14:22

here’s a nice article about Kape Technologies, the owner of PIA and two other VPN services: cnet.com/…/what-is-kape-technologies-what-you-nee…

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from noodlejetski@lemm.ee

Written by comradegreetingcard@lemmy.ml on 2024-08-21 at 19:28

Thanks.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from comradegreetingcard@lemmy.ml

Written by accideath@lemmy.world on 2024-08-22 at 11:24

Yea, but also PIA has been independently audited multiple times and their zero logs policy seems to hold up.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from accideath@lemmy.world

Written by mctoasterson@reddthat.com on 2024-08-21 at 23:17

Basically any VPN YouTubers shill is not going to result in a net gain in privacy (depending on your threat model) because many of them sell your data themselves, eagerly log traffic and comply with warrants, etc. Also their server IPs are usually known and blocked from various services.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mctoasterson@reddthat.com

Written by Blizzard@lemmy.zip on 2024-08-21 at 14:37

it’s… surpringly not horrible.

Except for the video thumbnail.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Blizzard@lemmy.zip

Written by bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml on 2024-08-21 at 14:45

Linus is on the left, that’s the only reason I watched the video

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml

Written by MinusPi (she/they) on 2024-08-22 at 10:39

He’s said that he hates it just as much, but it’s so effective that not doing it is just bad business.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from MinusPi@pawb.social

Written by Blizzard@lemmy.zip on 2024-08-22 at 11:03

“I know I’m making an idiot of myself but this way I’m making more money”

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Blizzard@lemmy.zip

Written by MinusPi (she/they) on 2024-08-22 at 11:37

He runs a business. Many people’s livelihoods rely on the performance of their videos.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from MinusPi@pawb.social

Written by Blizzard@lemmy.zip on 2024-08-22 at 12:23

Paint it however you like, it doesn’t change the facts.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Blizzard@lemmy.zip

Written by MinusPi (she/they) on 2024-08-22 at 12:38

He makes a fool of himself for money. No one is disputing that. You seem to be painting that as a bad thing.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from MinusPi@pawb.social

Written by shoki@lemmy.world on 2024-08-22 at 12:35

yeah, I’m kinda mad that they omitted organic maps, in my experience it is the cleanest osm app available.

(it may not have the most features but it’s easy to use and reliable)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from shoki@lemmy.world

Written by eldavi@lemmy.ml on 2024-08-22 at 20:19

the only horrible thing about this is how bad some of the alternatives are; somehow, it seems that google maps is the only one that will give you directions using public transit.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from eldavi@lemmy.ml

Written by noodlejetski@lemm.ee on 2024-08-22 at 20:38

if I had to guess, it’s probably somehow related to how everyone uses Google’s standard for public transport feed. I just use a separate transit app that covers bajillion of different cities in my country and lets me buy tickets without using Google Pay.

Organic Maps is testing public transport navigation, by the way, but it’s not available in released builds yet: github.com/…/EXPERIMENTAL_PUBLIC_TRANSPORT_SUPPOR…

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from noodlejetski@lemm.ee

Written by MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world on 2024-08-22 at 20:38

Out of the loop; what is wrong with PIA?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world

Written by SeattleRain@lemmy.world on 2024-09-23 at 12:51

What’s wrong with using Brave.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SeattleRain@lemmy.world

Written by noodlejetski@lemm.ee on 2024-09-23 at 13:40

www.spacebar.news/stop-using-brave-browser/

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from noodlejetski@lemm.ee

Written by Jalapeño Popper on 2024-08-21 at 15:19

I wonder how many of the people hating on Brave realize it was founded by one of the co-founders of Mozilla 🤔

Brave is a great alternative to chrome, and it doesn’t require any extensions to reach its full potential.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jalapeno_popper561@lemmy.ml

Written by noodlejetski@lemm.ee on 2024-08-21 at 16:14

we do, we also realise that it was founded only because he got kicked out for being a bigoted piece of shit

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from noodlejetski@lemm.ee

Written by Jalapeño Popper on 2024-08-21 at 17:26

That doesn’t stop Brave from being a superior product. Not that I’m defending the guy, I agree he’s a pos. But these browsers are both free as in beer and speech, so why would you kneecap yourself by using a sub-par engine? Brave ships ready to go out of the box. With Firefox, you have to add extensions just to get it up to Brave’s level.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jalapeno_popper561@lemmy.ml

Written by Senal@programming.dev on 2024-08-21 at 17:46

The subjectiveness of it being a superior product aside.

Brave is chromium under the hood and therefore contributes to the rendering engine homogeneity that leaves Google in control of web standards.

Iirc they are keeping some support for manifest v2 , for now. It’ll be interesting to see how that plays out for them both financially and from a technical upkeep point of view.

I’d guess it doesn’t last long, but haven’t looked at it hard enough to have an informed opinion on it.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Senal@programming.dev

Written by ZeroHora@lemmy.ml on 2024-08-21 at 17:55

so why would you kneecap yourself by using a sub-par engine?

So I can be free from chromium !!!

And the kneecap argument is really really really debatable.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ZeroHora@lemmy.ml

Written by foreverunsure@pawb.social on 2024-08-21 at 19:27

It’s true that you need extensions on FF to have some of Brave’s more advanced features. However, I consider this to be a good thing because you can skip their Web3/AI/Ads garbage and only get the features that matter like Forgetful Browsing (through Cookie AutoDelete) for a possibly lowered attack surface.

Any Chromium fork, no matter how against big tech it claims to be, is still at the mercy of Google at the end of the day. Nobody is going to spend their time or resources patching Manifest V2 back into the browser after it’s completely gone from the upstream.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from foreverunsure@pawb.social

Written by T (they/she) on 2024-08-21 at 19:41

I am very confused. Wasn’t Linus the one that said that if you watch YouTube videos from creators using adblockers is like pirating their content? I didn’t watch the video because I can’t stand LTT but I am genuinely confused. Did he change his mind?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Templa@beehaw.org

Written by ZeroHora@lemmy.ml on 2024-08-21 at 20:00

I think if was him he changes that a long time ago, they also have a video about pi-hole.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ZeroHora@lemmy.ml

Written by pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 2024-08-22 at 07:22

he promoted ublock and 2 others

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Written by sunnie on 2024-08-22 at 10:20

his reasoning is that anyone who cares enough to use an adblocker already is, and if it’s impossible to prevent it it should at least be done properly

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from reimufumo@lemmy.ca

Written by calm.like.a.bomb on 2024-08-21 at 20:29

Please stop promoting this creep!

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Written by perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world on 2024-08-21 at 23:12

I don’t know a lot about Linus. What makes him a creep?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world

Written by InputZero@lemmy.ml on 2024-08-22 at 11:54

His workplace has been accused of being a toxic workplace, including sexual harassment.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/linus-tech-tips-youtube-controversy-1.6940087

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from InputZero@lemmy.ml

Written by youmaynotknow on 2024-08-22 at 11:57

That, and he steals from companies that send him devices to review after he completely fucks up testing by doing it against all specs. Must be the one Canadian asshole that exists.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jjlinux@lemmy.ml

Written by someonesmall@lemmy.ml on 2024-08-23 at 19:13

Well-kept secret: There are nice people and assholes anywhere.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from someonesmall@lemmy.ml

Written by youmaynotknow on 2024-08-23 at 20:52

Lol, pretty sure you’re absolutely right.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jjlinux@lemmy.ml

Written by Pherenike on 2024-08-21 at 21:40

What a fucking joke.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Pherenike@lemmy.ml

Written by asudox on 2024-08-22 at 18:55

LTT is the worst channel for privacy. I do like the channel for new tech and all but not for digital privacy.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from AsudoxDev@programming.dev

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/thread/113000129506611445
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
568.920867 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
16.965793 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).