Automattic buys Beeper for $125MM, launches closed-source "privacy" app
https://discuss.online/post/6924461
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from delirious_owl@discuss.online
Curious how none of the coverage of this launch mention that the app isn’t actually open-source (though they pretend to be an open-source project), which makes all of their claims of “end-to-end encryption” worthless
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from delirious_owl@discuss.online
When I first heard of Beeper I thought it was interesting. But reading later that they were buying really old iPhones to jail break them for bridging with iMessage I had some doubts. Now they’re bought by the Wordpress people, who also bought Tumblr, and apparently selling user data to AI.. And from what I’ve read about bridges there is no E2EE with Matrix (what Beeper seems to use) to Signal bridge.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
Really, after what he did to Pebble, people shouldn’t have been surprised that Migicovsky didn’t and doesn’t have a plan. You couldn’t trust his word on Pebble, and you couldn’t trust his word on this.
In November 2022, they flubbed my onboarding by not telling me that the onboarding would be a recorded Zoom meeting until I was entering the Zoom meeting. I declined to join the meeting and followed up with questions about their privacy policy. Specifically, I referenced the previous sale of Pebble to a different company, and asked what guarantees there were about the privacy policy staying the same after a sale of the company. Specifically, it’s often one of the first things changed due to “enshittification” when purchased by a larger company, that the “rules” of your relationship to the company change. I never received a response to my questions. I sort of figured the lack of response said as much as a response could have which was “Yeah we don’t have any guarantees” which has been proven by this sale. Like you pointed out, they’re merging Beeper with a closed source project, of which the outcome will likely be… another closed source project.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
This is a mess and it makes me glad I never gave this charlatan a dime.
Thanks for sharing this. Makes me think that the words “open” and “privacy” are sometimes just buzz words used by
people who are stuck in their old habits that conflict with the real meaning of those words.
Spinning up your own Matrix server and bridges was always a better idea, since Beeper was just other people doing that step for you anyway.
Exactly. And now that Slidge has landed in Debian repositories, XMPP and bridges gives more choice to people who want self hosting.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
Does sludge let me use WhatsApp on my matrix client?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from delirious_owl@discuss.online
Guess not as Slidge is XMPP. But Matrix bridge with WhatsApp appears to be possible : etke.cc/help/bridges
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
“open” and “privacy” are sometimes just buzz words
Yes. Private companies are co-opting the term, and providing source code only after signing an NDA… That qualifies as “Open” but is not FOSS or FLOSS.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Kindness@lemmy.ml
Yeah, Beeper is kind of in a strange place now. I get why they wanted to make their own app to make the bridging experience (especially setup) more seamless. But now with a fully custom closed-source app they are even further off the open path.
What I really want from Beeper is to be able to connect to their bridges from a non-beeper Matrix account with a non-Beeper client. I would happily pay them for the service of managing bridges. I don’t have much interest in having a Beeper-owned account in a custom Beeper client.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kevincox@lemmy.ml
Well, I read on one of the articles that they moved to a custom app so the bridging could be done on your app, so the messages never get decrypted by Beepers servers.
But thats unverified gossip and cannot be verified so long as the repo isnt public
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from delirious_owl@discuss.online
Yeah, they’ve been talking about that a lot but it isn’t clear if that will be an option or the only option. I wouldn’t be surprised if they only want to keep one method around in the long term though.
Personally I don’t want the bridges to run on my phone as I want the bridges to work even if my phone is off, out of batteries, not connected to the internet or fell into a volcano. Not to mention wasting battery replaying messages while I work on my computer. It isn’t even clear if these on-phone bridges are synced to other devices in the account which would be an absolute deal breaker for me.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kevincox@lemmy.ml
Why don’t you use ems or another service that offers bridges?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from barbara@lemmy.ml
Does EMS offer bridges? Looking at element.io/pricing I don’t see anything. I seem to recall them having a Slack bridge in the past but don’t remember them having a full suite.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kevincox@lemmy.ml
ems.element.io/element-one
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from barbara@lemmy.ml
Also not really comparable to Beeper:
Beeper supports:
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kevincox@lemmy.ml
In this sub, most shouldn’t even matter 😅
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from barbara@lemmy.ml
Unfortunately even in this sub some of us need to talk to people who use privacy-unfriendly options.
So having bridges is a great way to slowly migrate to a private option. I can meet my friends where they are, stop running non-free software and then can slowly move my friends over.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kevincox@lemmy.ml
The encryption can’t be end-to-end anyway. If you send messages between services with different encryption protocols, then you trust Beeper to decrypt your message mid-transit, to then re-encrypt it with the protocol of the recipient.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
It could be if the bridge was on the device
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from delirious_owl@discuss.online
The whole point of the Beeper App is to let them handle everything, though.
And even if you self-host, you’re still breaking encryption and have to make sure everything is properly secured.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Not really. If I could have an open source client that will bridge to WhatsApp on my phone, I’d gladly use it.
The reason I don’t is because I don’t run closed source software on my phone.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from delirious_owl@discuss.online This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini