Toots for owen@mastodon.transneptune.net account

Written by Owen on 2025-01-31 at 18:57

So, it is good for OpenAI as a business to be able to show increasing use of the ChatGPT interfaces, including the free ones. DeepSeek's alleged queries would make a plot of users over time go up and to the right.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-31 at 18:57

OpenAI doesn't do this as a charitable gesture. They do this to build their business. The core proposition of OpenAI as a business is that they have a product which is too capital-intensive for anyone else to run, but which is too useful for anyone else to ignore. Getting people to use the product for free - and particularly, getting people to talk about how good their product is, for free - reinforces that narrative.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-31 at 18:56

OpenAI gives the general public free, minimally-metered access to ChatGPT. There are rate limits, and you can pay to raise those limits, but when you provide a prompt interface that can be used by any anonymous internet user, you necessarily have to allow anyone who has access to a bunch of IP addresses to use your product for free.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-31 at 18:54

What OpenAI is specifically accusing the DeepSeek team of doing, down at a nuts and bolts level, is sending prompts to their ChatGPT products, writing down the responses, and doing statistics on them to produce a model that, under training, becomes likely to give the same answers ChatGPT would.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-31 at 18:53

Lotta folks are quite rightly dragging OpenAI for their apparent stance on intellectual property, vis a vis competitors using their site. That's valid, but I think there's a much funnier analysis hiding under it.

OpenAI is telling the world that they missed a revenue opportunity. A big one.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-31 at 18:23

The thing is, business-database products did cease to exist, but idiosyncratic databases designed to support individual businesses and business processes, designed in large part by businesspeople and not programmers, didn't.

It all got folded into "spreadsheets."

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-28 at 17:42

Anyways nvidia is still worth three trillion, with a T, dollars, notional money, and the shareholder-lead push to replace expensive humans with planet-destroying machinery will continue unabated. A competitor coming up with a cheaper product isn't going to produce the kind of sea change that yesterday's press cycle would have you believe.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-28 at 17:40

This is a press pattern that is not unique to share prices, though share prices, being numbers, are a good source of news drama. News agencies make up the impact, even when reporting on the facts, all the time. Zoom out. Stand ten feet further away and look at the whole picture.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-28 at 17:39

If, like me and like a lot of people who have better things to do than gamble on the daily markets, the bulk of your investment money is in long-term investments (mine live in an RRSP), these kinds of blips Are meaningless, or so close as to be functionally uneventful.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-28 at 17:38

A fun thing to do when the press goes loud on some share price movement is to take the share price chart and zoom it out to the six month or one year horizon.

Nearly universally, the day's Big News, like a 15% day-over-day share price drop, turns into line noise, lost in the overall trend those same securities' prices. That doesn't make those daily variations meaningless, but it does mean that they have very little impact on people who aren't trading on day-over-day volatility.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-28 at 04:45

Of course, you're stuck to the floor afterwards, as your only subsequent movement options are going to be Paradox, High Thunder, Foul, or (ick) Scathe, until Swiftcast comes off of cooldown again, or until your next Xenoglossy tick.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-28 at 04:44

2/2

Foul, weave Swiftcast.

Flare Star.

That's 13 GCDs. 14 if you had Power Amplifier off cooldown in time to use it. At a 2.38s spell speed, that works out to either 31 or 33 seconds of instant-cast spells and "free" movement, and it even slightly increases DPS over the normal rotation by accelerating Fire 4.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-28 at 04:42

Normal, castbar-having Fire 3. Weave Triplecast in the gap, then start running.

The rest is instants:

Three Fire 4 casts, plus either Thunder or Xenoglossy.

Paradox, weave Triplecast again since Paradox is instant anyways and you got time.

Three more F4 casts, plus whichever of Thunder or Xenoglossy you didn't already use.

Fire 3 (instant, thanks to the free Firestarter from Paradox).

Xenoglossy.

Optionally, Power Amplifier plus another Xenoglossy. 1/2

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-28 at 04:37

Black Mage has a well-deserved reputation for being the least mobile caster in FFXIV, but with a bit of forward planning (and if you don't mind being completely out of movement options afterwards) you can extend the class' free movement time to well over 30 seconds - an entire fire phase plus High Thunder and two Xenoglossy charges - during which time you never have to stop moving if you don't want to? Which is insane?

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-27 at 19:08

"Ah, I have invented Sharon Apple, from the hit anime OVA Macross: Don't Invent Sharon Apple."

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-27 at 18:59

I showed her this post and "There are lines on the floor."

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-27 at 18:38

Well, "released," it's pretty clearly a very early-stage early access product right now, a lot of the stuff I found fun in the first game is still in the roadmap and not the game.

But still. There's a playable thing.

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-27 at 18:37

Me: I really need to cut back on games for a bit

Also me: holy shit space engineers 2 actually released?

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-27 at 18:35

(The one that always wings me is Vorpal Trail.)

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

Written by Owen on 2025-01-27 at 18:32

Proper shitpostxiv-style diagram on the top of my notepad today after trying to explain Everkeep's Forged Track mechanic to my partner.

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | View the thread

=> This profile with reblog | Go to owen@mastodon.transneptune.net account

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/profile/71924
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
310.421456 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
5.895032 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).