Help me out!
What is your favorite #XMPP / #Jabber client and why?
(boosts welcome)
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Just a few quick thoughts on making sense of science linking vegetarianism with depression.
[#]^https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/display/7510e48f-e867-4712-8fec-6cff05f83523
dynamic_hubzilla schrieb den folgenden Beitrag Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:22:03 +0100 @David Ho
Regarding the association between veganism and depression, correlation is not causation. There are probably dozens of reasonable hypotheses for how differing psychological profiles could lead to differences in dietary choices.
A casual DuckDuckGo search also turns up this interesting piece on meat-reducers having higher depression than either meat-eaters or vegetarians and vegans, which the author hypothesize might be linked to the cognitive dissonance of opposing the meat industry but continuing to eat meat: #^https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329322001549
It's also worth noting that the Telegraph has a history of a pro-meat stance.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Have you (knowingly) had COVID? If so, when did you have your first case?
(boosts welcome)
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Petition:
[#]^https://actionnetwork.org/forms/urge-delegates-elect-ben-wikler-chair-of-the-dnc/
Quote:
"...
There’s no way the Party can speak for the majority of working people in America when it’s reluctant to bite the hands that feed it.
"Wikler gets this key ingredient, the thing that sets the Democrats apart from Republicans and makes us the ones who can truly stand up for the working class, as he says: “Democrats win when voters know that we’re the ones fighting for them against those who will seek to rip them off to add an extra billion dollars to their bank account.”
"Tell the DNC: Become the anti-establishment party and shake up the system on behalf of the vast majority of Americans! Vote for Ben Wikler for DNC Chair!"
(boosts welcome)
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Icons icons everywhere.
Without stopping to think, what do they mean?
(boosts welcome)
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Themes of resistance are coming up a lot lately, and also the simultaneous acknowledgment that we all need to prioritize self preservation, with also the duty of those of us in relative safety to stand up and speak out.
Some time ago, a friend of mine posted a meme you may have seen: "Be yourself, unless you can be a dragon. Then be a dragon."
A few days ago, a different friend posted a link to this (heartbreaking) essay on cockroach mode: #^https://www.everywhereist.com/2024/11/it-is-time-for-our-cockroach-era/
But a lot of us have a duty to do more, actions big and small, and Saturday night I awoke in the night with the phrase "time to be awesome" already in my head, and a moment later my heart was racing.
So here a message for anyone who needs to hear it:
If you need to be a cockroach, then be a cockroach. If you don't need to be a cockroach, be awesome. (If you can be an awesome cockroach, that's cool too.)
Anyway, here's Rainbow Dash from My Little Pony:
[#]^https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rgBWhNIDOE
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Quote:
[#]^https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/as-global-fire-risk-rises-modern-homes-become-toxic-plastic-traps/
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Found this pinto potato in our stash today.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Back in March I did a quick test drive of #Hubzilla, which I wrote about here:
[#]^https://social.coop/@dynamic/112116628610243658
with an addendum here:
[#]^https://social.coop/@dynamic/112123974569355483
There are a lot of details that I didn't get quite right in that first Mastodon thread, and I'm not going to attempt to make systemic corrections here. However, after using Hubzilla as my primary Fediverse platform for two weeks, I'm somewhat better informed, and I'm providing some of my observations here.
For starters, a reminder that Hubzilla has a ton of features and is highly configurable. This is not a "deep dive" and I am not an expert on Hubzilla, nor do I expect to be in the near future, there's just too much to learn. What I can describe is my own experiences after a week of settling in and configuration.
Updated Comparison between Hubzilla and #Mastodon
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Yesterday I did some phone banking, calling "persuadable voters" in a swing district to encourage them to vote for the Democratic congressional candidate rather than the "MAGA" incumbent. I volunteer through Swing Blue Alliance (SBA), and the organizers said that this particular bank is the hardest one that SBA hosts. Below are some thoughts how these calls go, with some thoughts on things the caller and receiver can do to improve outcomes.
tl;dr: When and how you identify yourself matters, although in a world shared with telemarketers and scam artists, I'm not sure there's a single best answer.
Yesterday's phone bank
As noted above, yesterday I was calling "persuadable" voters, which means the list includes Republicans and independents as well as Democrats who might or might not vote. Combined with the fact that most people don't want phone calls from strangers to begin with and the fact that this is a swing district, there were a lot of hang-ups, a lot of "why do you keep calling me", and a lot of "I'm voting for the other candidate," and a decent amount of "I don't vote."
Believe it or not, not all phone banks are like this. Volunteer-recruiting phone banks are particularly pleasant, because it's volunteers calling other volunteers, often people who have asked to be contacted. But get-out-the-vote (GOTV) phone banks are often not too bad either, because GOTV lists target sympathetic voters. That doesn't mean the experience is stress-free, of course.
Phone-banking process and tradeoffs for the people being called
The instructions that we as phone bankers get can vary, but we are usually instructed to be very conservative in who gets removed from the list:
It's in the interest of the political organizations to have well-curated lists, with wrong numbers removed, as well as the numbers of people who will never accept one of these calls. In theory, well-curated lists can also produce better outcomes for the people being called (including not getting called as much if they don't want to be), although I can understand reservations about being forthcoming.
The upshot is that if you want to reduce the number of political calls you receive, it can sometimes be helpful to take a moment to engage, particularly if the call is coming from a legitimate political campaign. Confirming your identity and and explicitly saying that you want to be removed from the list can substantially reduce the number of future calls you'll receive.
On the other hand, I don't want to make blanket recommendations. I'm fairly certain that there are also telemarketers and scammers out there who would be all too delighted to have confirmation that they have the correct match between name and phone number. So that sucks. I wish I had a magic formula for recognizing legitimate political calls but the best I can say is that I think volunteers are more likely to treat you like a human being. It's tricky.
Wrong numbers
I think it's usually pretty safe to let callers know if they have the wrong number, though.
The phone banking script
This brings me around to the phone banking scripts, and how we as phone bankers start the call. There are two general approaches:
I tend to much prefer receiving calls that start with the second template. When a stranger calls me and asks whether I'm me without identifying themselves, my first thought is "Who the f*ck are you?"
But I tried both approaches at the phone bank yesterday, and I ended up feeling better about the first template.
There's no guarantee that an immediate hangup will end up being coded as "refused". A clear statement of wanting to be removed is more likely to be coded correctly.
I still feel ambivalent about the two versions of the script, the tradeoff courtesy (identifying myself first) and saving everyone's time (trying to confirm their identity first), but I'm leaning more toward efficiency at the moment.
Bottom line for people receiving political calls
If your sense is that you're getting a call from a legitimate political campaign, it can really help to confirm your identity and clearly express your preferences. If the call is a wrong number, I think it's almost always best to say so.
There's unfortunately no response that will absolutely guarantee against future calls, partly because each campaign usually has multiple organizations calling for them, and partly because mistakes happen. Caller interfaces and instructions can also vary, which also produces inconsistent results. Some lists also have duplicate entries, which is complicated further if multiple people share a phone number.
Closing thoughts
If you live in a U.S. swing district, I send you my sympathies. It's really not sane that the U.S. political system favors strategies where the whole country focuses money and volunteer efforts onto a small number of swing districts. I don't think this system is at all good for democracy nor for political engagement, and I'd really like to see this change. I'm not sure what the best path is for getting there, although I know there are a number of ideas out there, and I'll have an ear to the ground for possible strategies moving forward.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
So... avatar images. And also a chance to test out how Hubzilla-to-Mastodon federated polling works.
When I first joined the cybre.space Mastodon instance in 2019 I resisted setting up a profile. This is kind of a thing with me when joining new platforms, and I'm not sure exactly why. I think it's partly nostalgia for AOL Instant Messenger, partly a feeling that social media really shouldn't be taken seriously, and partly a pushback against the whole Facebook-style real-names-or-else corporate communications culture. In any case, it happened.
When I migrated to social.coop, I set up a profile (as mandated by instance policies), but never got around to creating an avatar image that felt right for the account, so I continued with no avatar image. And now it kind of feels like... a thing. Like no-avatar-image is part of my identity.
Poll allows multiple responses, and has an expiration date in 100 days.
So, with all of that in mind, if I were to decide to double-down on non-brand branding for avatar images, what do you think I should do?
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
=> This profile with reblog | Go to dynamic@hub.netzgemeinde.eu account This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini