I've added the first module with squares to the proarrow library. It's only the basics and so still very abstract.
I think I need to fix haddock, because the way it renders kind-heavy type signatures is ridiculous. It needs more visual hierarchy!
https://sjoerdvisscher.github.io/proarrow/Proarrow-Squares.html
[#]haskell
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Anything found in the category of categories and functors is profound in the category of categories and profunctors.
This is a joke but also feels kind of true?
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Shower thought 1: If you're the kind of programmer that hates that top and bottom have a different character length, then you're allowed to shorten bottom to bot but then you also have to rename top to tob.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
=> This profile without reblog | Go to sjoerd_visscher@types.pl account This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini