@BrodieOnLinux
Case and point: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html
Bundling freedom into the idea of open source, which is what the Open Source Initiative® does, does real harm to up and coming commercial open source projects. E.g. @Vivaldi
The freedoms to modify and redistribute help keep incumbent companies in their place at the expense of smaller new companies.
Which is an issue that @fsf has never really addressed.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
@BrodieOnLinux
Was just watching your video on FUTO's open source definition and I would say I agree with their definition of open source in fact if you read @rms reasons for dislikeing the term it is exactly because of the distinction.
The open source initiative's definition is not just open source it's FOSS (they are a fork of the FSF after all) which is a lot more restrictive. Despite their name they are not be all and end all of what it means to be open source. #FOSS #opensource
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Hvað er hægt að gera á föstudagskvöldi í Reykjavík?
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
=> This profile without reblog | Go to BJ@loðfíll.is account This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini