Posted by Michael R Bussell Sat Jun 18 15:07:32 2011.
Message: When facing the IED threat, we know that the device builder may use a variety of means to function the device. In Iraq, the use of jamming equipment was useful, while back in Afghanistan, jamming equipment has less of an impact because the enemy quickly adapted to counter some of our protocols. What can we learn from this?
We can learn that we should never underestimate the capabilities of our foes or the elements which we are in. We can learn that thrests are everchanging, and that we must, too, be everchanging. Though the methods used in one place at one time may pay off, we must realize that these efforts will inevitably be thwarted in some way, if not by our foe, then by the shear nature of the elements. This is true, not only in facing IEDs in the mid-east, but everywhere in our lives in any given situation. To combat this, we must work harder, better, faster and stronger[1] through the adoption of better tactics, furthering our knowledge and simply “thinking outside of the box”.
=> 1: http://youtu.be/bl6RJyZdBSU
Mirrored from Being Jeremiah Palmer[2].
=> 2: http://kg4vma.duckdns.org/2011/06/weeks-3-and-4/
Tags: #American Public University, #APUS, #college, #school
[…] “Weeks 3 and 4” was originally published on J. Palmer […]
=> 🔙 Previous Page This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini