=> back to Techrights (Main Index)
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:14] yeah this is exactly why i've never gone public
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:14] it's my word against his
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:14] and, being on his good side was profitable for a few years
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:14] ever since the fsf abandoned me back in xxxx, i've had no reason to cosy up to them
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:14] I've seen worse things from other people
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:14] you know
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:15] my defense against him last year was actually an attack
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:15] do you know why i say that?
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:15] well, being facetious is not good
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:15] if he had either not publicly re-joined the board, or if he had lost and been kicked out again:
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:15] and you wanted to be ED
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:15] now you tell me this
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:15] if that had happened, he would have been a martyr
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:16] and he'd have a stronger position in the community than he does now
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:16] him "winning" was the worst thing for him. because it puts him in the spotlight again
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:16] well, not a smoking gun but:
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:16] have you ever considered why he has never had a girlfriend?
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:16] he has said he had one in his youth, but none since
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:17] and as you said, he was close to epstein
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:18] this is also another reason why i attacked stallman in xxxxx, while stating another reason - but i was constantly drunk back then and ended up going overboard and i became the topic of debate instead of him
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:18] 2021 was my revenge for xxxxxx
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:18] my defense served two purposes:
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:18] * prevent rms being a martyr. he would have been better off stepping down again
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:18] (i targeted the sycophants who enabled him, emboldening them to be more rigorous in their defenses)
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:19] * distract people from my takeover of xxxx
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:19] i've told xxxxxxx all of this
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:19] i decided to tell it all to you, on a whim
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:19] i hate stallman's guts
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:19] thing is, i bet if i came forward, others would too. but i won't
00:10 schestowitz-TR; [15:19] i've seen how that ends. and i don't want to be harassed
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:19] i will never go public with any of this. but i've told a few people
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:20] [15:16] have you ever considered why he has never had a girlfriend?
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:20] he did have relationship
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:20] so the statement is not true
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:21] and his exes spoke out in his defence
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:21] [15:17] and as you said, he was close to epstein
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:21] no!
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:21] that's bill gates
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:21] rms never met the creep and rms called epstein very bad things
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:22] oh ok
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:23] the only think you say you can go public with is more trivial than you put it
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:23] sans name-calling
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:23] i don't have strong enough evidence against him
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:23] but i know he's a pedo
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:23] but I don't know the exact words he used
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:23] he does stare at many people, even men
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:23] and he wrote about it, some tried to train him to not do that
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:23] i do have the power to cause doubt in the minds of his inner circle though
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:24] that's why i've approached several members of the gnu advisory committee privately
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:24] anyway, the chat is over for now
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:24] we go in circles
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:24] oh?
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:24] ok
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:24] i actually just woke up and have work to do anyway
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:25] don't be offended
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:25] I just got back home
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:25] thanks for shasring the story from xxxxxx
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:25] I want to catch up with news links
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:25] i understand
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:25] what he wrote publicly is more incriminating
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:25] you have a very practical and utilitarian mindset. it's one thing i've noticed about you
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] and even though it's "old news" I still object strongly to what he wrote
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] and i respect it
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] but let's leave it at that
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] btw
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] my new cashcow is bsd
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] rather than fsf/gnu
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] been promoting myself to the bsd crowd lately. they love me
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] openbsd seems robust
00:11 schestowitz-TR; [15:26] been doing openbsd installs on laptops recently
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:27] but openbsd lacks a lot of things for "mass" adoption
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:27] so I appreciate openbsd
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:27] for my customers, it's perfect
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:27] but not for my workflow
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:27] what things does it lack for mass adoption?
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:28] we talked about it in irc last night
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:28] oh ok
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:28] summarize it for me while i read it
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:28] around midnight, search scrollbuffer
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:28] I really want to post news links now
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:28] I appreciate what you told me about xxxxx
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:28] it helps me form an opinion
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] the rest is rehash and some name-calling, like "creep"
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] he's on the spectrum
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] I try to treat differently people who lack tact
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] that's tolerance
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] ok
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] like helping an old lady cross the road
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] "do you think I'm too weak !!"
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] i understand
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:29] "no, I could see you could use seome help"
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:30] this reminds me of a louis rossman video
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:30] he was talkingabout what to say to a new employer if your old one was an asshole
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:30] and he said: don't say your old boss was an asshole or this and that, just say what he did and why you left
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:30] etc
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:31] good tip
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:31] and to borrow an analogy
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:31] don't say LF "sucks" or RMS "creep"
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:32] explain what happened
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:32] and let people form their opinion
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:32] i'll let you get on with your work
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:32] thanks for the chat
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:32] my pleasure!
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:32] btw
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:32] quick tip:
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:32] always be consistent
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:33] if you attack RMS, then defend, then attack
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [15:33] it'll catch up with you
00:12 schestowitz-TR; [16:22] i know
00:13 schestowitz-TR; [16:22] i'm not going to mention his name publicly or do anything for/against him from now on
00:13 schestowitz-TR; [16:22] 2021 was a "reset" year
00:13 schestowitz-TR; [16:22] it served 3 purposes:
00:13 schestowitz-TR; [16:22] * restore reputation
00:13 schestowitz-TR; [16:23] * xxxxx takeover. revive the project (it was dead)
00:13 schestowitz-TR; [16:23] * actually distance myself from the fsf
00:13 schestowitz-TR; [16:23] trying to join fsf as ed wasn't really a serious effort
00:13 schestowitz-TR; [16:23] i knew i wouldn't be accepted. i was just trolling them basically
01:33 *orgy has quit (Quit: Connection closed)
03:59 *Despatche has quit (connection closed)
04:00 *Despatche (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:37 *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
05:37 *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
06:20 *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)
06:21 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@bkb7tdc7zpz6c.irc) has joined #techbytes
06:30 *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)
06:46 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@9bsrk9cwiznhk.irc) has joined #techbytes
06:54 *rianne (~rianne@s44cwn8sugddy.irc) has joined #techbytes
06:54 *asusbox (~rianne@s44cwn8sugddy.irc) has joined #techbytes
07:13 schestowitz; https://www.reddit.com/r/Meovely/comments/u8ra6d/microsofts_human_resources_hr_policy_we_offer/
=> ↺ https://www.reddit.com/r/Meovely/comments/u8ra6d/microsofts_human_resources_hr_policy_we_offer/
07:13 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.reddit.com | Microsofts Human Resources (HR) Policy: We Offer Assistance to Perpetrators of Domestic Violence : Meovely
07:13 schestowitz; "
07:13 schestowitz; WE WANT MICROSOFT, THEIR CLOWNS AND OTHER PERVERTED STAFFERS, CONTRACTORS OR WHATEVER TO NEVER USE THE NAME MELINA TO POST PR0N EVER AGAIN !
07:13 schestowitz; WE WANT THEM TO F OFF AND STAY AWAY FROM MELINA.
07:13 schestowitz; WHERE IS THEIR INVESTOR SUPER WOMAN ?
07:13 schestowitz; WE WANT THEM TO STAY AWAY FROM OUR SUBREDDITS ALSO !!! WE'RE FED UP OF BEING OBLIGED TO GO RESTRICTED "OR ELSE" !!!
07:13 schestowitz; We are scared for Melina's safety, as those people have been found guilty of s3x trafficking, assault, r@pe, harassment and the likes !!!!!!
07:13 schestowitz; We will keep on screaming in terror until they stop !!!
07:13 schestowitz; "
07:38 *Despatche_ (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytes
07:39 *Despatche has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
07:41 schestowitz; > Hi Roy,
07:41 schestowitz; >
07:41 schestowitz; > Hope you're very well.
07:41 schestowitz; Yes, thanks. I was just going through your articles a couple of days ago.
07:41 schestowitz; > If I wanted to give readers a single link that was a powerful and
07:41 schestowitz; > authoritative account of all the official legal cases against
07:41 schestowitz; > Microsoft (and/or Google) in respect of anti-trust, bribery etc, what
07:41 schestowitz; > would you recommend?
07:41 schestowitz; http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653
=> ↺ http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653
07:41 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.groklaw.net | Groklaw - Microsoft Litigation
07:41 schestowitz; > Do you know of any initiatives in support of the European Digital
07:41 schestowitz; > Markets Act (and BTW - what do you personally think of it)
07:41 schestowitz; >
07:41 schestowitz; > all good wishes,
07:41 schestowitz; I am not familiar with it, never read it myself, but I know someone who might know better. I can ask if you want.
07:49 schestowitz; Jack from E.ON Next wrote on 21/04/2022 15:21:
07:49 schestowitz; > Hi Roy,
07:49 schestowitz; >
07:49 schestowitz; > Thank you for your reply,
07:49 schestowitz; >
07:49 schestowitz; > Please can you provide more information on why you believe you pay extra
07:49 schestowitz; > to get more frequent data collection readings? This is not a service
07:49 schestowitz; > E-on Next provide.
07:49 schestowitz; >
07:49 schestowitz; > Jack
07:49 schestowitz; >
07:49 schestowitz; > E-on Next
08:50 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes
08:56 *u-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed)
08:57 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:08 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
10:23 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:47 *Despatche_ has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer)
14:56 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
17:24 *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
17:26 *psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
17:26 *psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes
17:46 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
18:00 *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
18:00 *psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes
22:01 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes
22:04 schestowitz; >> Yes, thanks. I was just going through your articles a couple of days ago.
22:04 schestowitz; > Sorry I've not had time to write anything lately for Techrights.
22:04 schestowitz; > But techrights always in my mind when considering an idea as
22:04 schestowitz; > a possible destination.
22:04 schestowitz; We've been around for many years and will stay afloat for many years.
22:04 schestowitz; >>> If I wanted to give readers a single link that was a powerful and
22:04 schestowitz; >>> authoritative account of all the official legal cases against
22:04 schestowitz; >>> Microsoft (and/or Google) in respect of anti-trust, bribery etc, what
22:04 schestowitz; >>> would you recommend?
22:04 schestowitz; >> http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653
=> ↺ http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653
22:04 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.groklaw.net | Groklaw - Microsoft Litigation
22:04 schestowitz; > Thanks very much.
22:04 schestowitz; Tell me if you need more.
22:04 schestowitz; >>> Markets Act (and BTW - what do you personally think of it)
22:04 schestowitz; >> I am not familiar with it, never read it myself, but I know someone who
22:04 schestowitz; >> might know better. I can ask if you want.
22:04 schestowitz; > If you know anyone who has written intelligently on it I'd be
22:04 schestowitz; > curious. There's always a downside to these things (and I know you're
22:04 schestowitz; > rightly critical of European corruption), but this one seemed to have
22:04 schestowitz; > some merits for fighting monopoly infrastructure such as MS/Google in
22:04 schestowitz; > schools etc.
22:04 schestowitz; Not so much "European corruption" as much as EPO corruption or patent abuse. Today we start a 14-part series about EPO-Belarus-Russia.
22:04 schestowitz; I don't know who promotes the above law (if Breton, be suspicious; we wrote tons about him), but I know someone who might know a lot more about it.
22:04 schestowitz; When I try to speak to politicians it goes almost nowhere at the end, e.g.: http://techrights.org/2021/10/02/merkel-epo-legacy/
=> http://techrights.org/2021/10/02/merkel-epo-legacy/
22:04 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Angela Merkels Coalition Has Not Helped EPO Staff and Not Even Bloggers Blackmailed by EPO Management | Techrights
22:17 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
22:18 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes
22:38 *u-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed)
23:20 *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
23:25 *Despatche (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytes
=> back to Techrights (Main Index) This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini;lang=en-GB