=> back to Techrights (Main Index)
00:50 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
00:52 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
03:19 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@nqkitbgnqjad4.irc) has joined #techbytes
03:31 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
03:32 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@nqkitbgnqjad4.irc) has joined #techbytes
03:54 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
04:54 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@nqkitbgnqjad4.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:07 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
05:36 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@nqkitbgnqjad4.irc) has joined #techbytes
06:23 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
06:26 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
06:45 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
08:20 schestowitz;
08:20 schestowitz; Linux Kernel 6.2 Reaches End of Life, Users Urged to Upgrade to Linux Kernel 6.3
08:20 schestowitz;
08:20 schestowitz; Being a short-lived kernel branch, Linux 6.2 has now reached end of life (EOL) with the Linux 6.2.16 release that was announced today by renowned kernel developer and maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman, who urges users to upgrade to the latest Linux 6.3 kernel series as soon as possible.
08:20 schestowitz;
08:20 schestowitz;
08:20 schestowitz;
08:20 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Linux Kernel 6.2 Reaches End of Life, Users Urged to Upgrade to Linux Kernel 6.3 - 9to5Linux
08:31 *Noisytoot has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in)
08:32 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:01 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@nqkitbgnqjad4.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:24 *acer-box (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes
10:24 *schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)
10:31 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
10:39 schestowitz; +x2
10:39 schestowitz; CNET Workers Unionize as Automated Technology Threatens Our Jobs
10:39 schestowitz;
10:39 schestowitz; Around 100 workers are unionizing at CNET, a popular tech news and product review site, in response to a lack of transparency from management regarding layoffs and the companys use of AI, according to an announcement by the union Tuesday.
10:39 schestowitz;
10:39 schestowitz;
10:39 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.vice.com | CNET Workers Unionize as Automated Technology Threatens Our Jobs
10:56 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
11:16 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
11:19 *Noisytoot has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in)
11:21 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes
11:44 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
11:47 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
13:50 *GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
13:51 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@282dmj5h35cfi.irc) has joined #techbytes
23:17 schestowitz; http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/04/construing-claims-to-include-technical.html?showComment=1684256765283#c3378598045111789984
23:17 schestowitz; Forgive me if this has already been addressed, but I am wondering whether a feature in claim 1 with a prima facie narrow meaning could be given a broader meaning when interpreted in light of the description? I have a specific case in mind, where claim 1 refers to a "Boolean input". On the face of it, this would mean either true or false, 1 or 0. The description, however, makes it clear that this is actually intended to be much
23:17 schestowitz; broader, covering any input string. How should an opposition division construe the claim feature? Narrowly (and therefore possibly novel) or broadly (and therefore lacking novelty)?
23:17 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Construing the claims to include technical effects mentioned in the description (T 1924/20) - The IPKat
23:18 schestowitz; http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/05/breaking-in-person-proceedings-are.html?showComment=1684329325621#c8583714408016346706
23:18 schestowitz; @proof of the puddingYour suggestion to preemptively include in any petition dealing with Vico a request to exclude the chair of the BA from EBA panels must be considered. It could even be generalised so that the chair of the BA is 100 % exempted of acting as a judge and can focus on his/her managerial duties.
23:18 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | BREAKING: In-person proceedings are still the "Gold Standard" - Boards of Appeal start to diverge on ViCo (T 2432/19) - The IPKat
=> back to Techrights (Main Index) This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini;lang=en-GB