=> back to Techrights (Main Index)
00:16 *psydroid2 has quit (connection closed)
01:08 *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
01:08 *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
01:38 schestowitz; "Dear colleagues,
01:38 schestowitz; First of all, let us give a big thank you to all those who voted in the Staff Rep elections in June. We appreciate your support and were impressed by the high turnout in the election of 69% of staff in The Hague! We would like to thank all the candidates that stood in the elections and extend a special thank you to the election committee who took on the task of organising the whole process.
01:38 schestowitz; We have now also completed the constitution process to elect to the various roles according to the Articles 30 and 31 of the election rules that were approved by staff in a General Assembly in March. The composition of the Local staff committee is as follows:"
01:38 schestowitz; "Dear colleagues,
01:38 schestowitz; Home leave is regulated by the CODEX in Art 60 ServRegs, with the reimbursement of costs done according to Art 77(3) and Art 80(1)(c) ServRegs. In principle, this means that the actual costs for the journey should be reimbursed:
01:38 schestowitz; Travel expenses, actually incurred for the outward and return journey between the place of employment and his home, for such leave shall be reimbursed to the employee concerned
01:38 schestowitz; "
01:39 schestowitz; "
01:39 schestowitz; It makes sense to request reimbursement of the actual expenses one incurs to travel to & from their place of home leave (with their family), if these exceed the lump-sum calculation.
01:39 schestowitz; When requesting home leave, the administration will provide you with a calculation for your expenses. If the calculation comprises a total sum of travel expenses that is lower than the actual expenses you incurred for the travel, we encourage you to request the reimbursement of your actual costs and to do so before the actual journey. (Bear in mind youll of course need the invoices/tickets/proof of payment to establish your actua
01:39 schestowitz; l travel costs towards the administration)"
02:05 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
02:06 schestowitz; http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/06/new-eba-referral-when-is-prior-use-of.html?showComment=1688547499111#c3947956183221279191
02:06 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | New EBA referral: When is prior use of a product excluded from the prior art for lack of enablement? - The IPKat
02:06 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes
02:06 schestowitz; I like the analogy used by the opponent in the referring decision (also adopted by the Board at reasons paragraph 20). The recipe of Coca Cola is secret and it is not exactly reproducible without that secret recipe. But we know that it is a fizzy drink (i.e. carbonated and sugary) and that it contains a caramel colour.If I understand the logic of the first anonymous, this does not count as prior art against someone trying to
02:06 schestowitz; claim a carbonated, sugary, caramel-coloured drink, because Coca Cola is not reproducible. Clearly this is an absurd result. Surely what matters is that the relevant properties of the product are known, even if not every detail is known (i.e. including details which are irrelevant to the claim).
02:07 schestowitz; If someone trialling a ploughshare in the middle of nowhere counts as prior art because there was a public footpath within sight then a product placed on the market is also prior art.
02:07 schestowitz; The referring decision mixes up things. Some properties (composition) of the allegedly prior used material are disclosed in D1, D2 and D5/5a, so for inventive step one could start from any of these documents as such, provided that they belong to the prior art, not fro the prior use of the material, which would require analysis/reproducibility according to G1/92. This could have been clarified by the board and did not need a referral.
05:03 *asusbox (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:04 *rianne_ (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:13 *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)
05:13 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@cxkaa3wjkjdy8.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:14 *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
05:14 *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
06:58 *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)
06:58 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@5cyuy7w3cjfkn.irc) has joined #techbytes
07:18 *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)
07:21 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@dzbhpdqw54sra.irc) has joined #techbytes
11:30 *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes
12:49 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
12:51 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes
13:17 schestowitz;
13:17 schestowitz; SUSE says it will fork RHEL source code for use by world+dog
13:17 schestowitz;
13:17 schestowitz; German open source vendor SUSE has said it will invest more than US$10 million (A$14.97 million) to fork the publicly available source code for Red Hat Enterprise Linux and make it available to world+dog with no restrictions.
13:17 schestowitz;
13:17 schestowitz;
13:17 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-iTWire - SUSE says it will fork RHEL source code for use by world+dog
13:26 schestowitz;
13:26 schestowitz; Our Fastest, Most Beautiful Release Ever: Thunderbird 115 Supernova Is Here!
13:26 schestowitz;
13:26 schestowitz; On behalf of the Thunderbird team, Thunderbird Council, our global community of contributors, and our extended Mozilla family, I am incredibly excited to announce the initial launch of Thunderbird 115 Supernova for Linux, macOS, and Windows! With this years version, were delivering much more than just another yearly release. Supernova represents a modernized overhaul of the software bot
13:26 schestowitz; h visually and technically while retaining the familiarity and flexibility you expect from Thunderbird.
13:26 schestowitz;
13:26 schestowitz;
13:26 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-blog.thunderbird.net | Our Fastest, Most Beautiful Release Ever: Thunderbird 115 "Supernova" Is Here!
15:04 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
15:05 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes
15:26 schestowitz; x https://off-guardian.org/2023/07/11/no-bill-gates-didnt-fund-gm-mosquitoes-to-stop-malaria-its-far-worse-than-that/
15:26 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-off-guardian.org | NO, Bill Gates didnt fund GM mosquitoes to stop malariaits far worse than that. OffGuardian
15:26 schestowitz; x https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/07/11/1076094/bill-gates-isnt-scared-about-ai-existential-risk/
15:26 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.technologyreview.com | Bill Gates isn't too scared about AI | MIT Technology Review
21:23 *asusbox (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes
21:23 *rianne_ (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes
=> back to Techrights (Main Index) This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini;lang=en-GB