This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2022/11/22/epo-censors-critics/.

● 11.22.22

Gemini version available ♊︎

●● From About 2-3 Blog Posts Per Day to Not Even One Per Day (After Covering Up for ‘Good’ EPO Under António Campinos)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 10:07 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

If blogs don’t cover what people care about and what needs to be said, writers and readers will go elsewhere

Image: Meme of chocolate gorilla: Blogs 2009 - 2020

With just over a month left in the year:

Image: IP Kat archives with just over a month left in the year

Summary: While it’s totally debatable whether the problem is IP Kat’s deletion of comments critical of António Campinos (among other such factors after pressure from the EPO [1-7]) or blogs in general perishing, this blog certainly peaked when it covered EPO scandals (864 blog posts in 2015 and 879 in 2014 — the highest ever in the blog’s almost-20-year history)

=> António Campinos | EPO

Luis has new reputation-laundering priorities:

=> new reputation-laundering

Image: António Campinos: I will silence your critics like I silenced my critics at IP Kat, using blackmail tactics; Klaus Grabinski: Sounds good, mein master

IP Kat and Censorship:

The Last Comment in IP Kat (Before Censorship) Was About Patent Quality at the EPO

=> 1 The Last Comment in IP Kat (Before Censorship) Was About Patent Quality at the EPO

Personal Attacks, Censorship of Comments and More Nefarious Tricks Expected in the Wake of UPC Panic

=> 2 Personal Attacks, Censorship of Comments and More Nefarious Tricks Expected in the Wake of UPC Panic

In Spite of Censorship by IP Kat, Issues Associated With UPC Had Become Apparent, Even Before Germany Halted Ratification

=> 3 In Spite of Censorship by IP Kat, Issues Associated With UPC Had Become Apparent, Even Before Germany Halted Ratification

Has IP Kat’s Unofficial (Self-)Censorship Policy Expanded From Protecting the EPO’s Image to Protecting the UPC?

=> 4 Has IP Kat’s Unofficial (Self-)Censorship Policy Expanded From Protecting the EPO’s Image to Protecting the UPC?

EPO Self-Censorship by IP Kat or Just Censorship of Opinions That IP Kat Does Not Share/Accept (Updated)

=> 5 EPO Self-Censorship by IP Kat or Just Censorship of Opinions That IP Kat Does Not Share/Accept (Updated)

Heiko Maas, the SPD “Cash for Access” Affair, and Suspicions of Unwarranted Censorship at IP Kat (Again)

=> 6 Heiko Maas, the SPD “Cash for Access” Affair, and Suspicions of Unwarranted Censorship at IP Kat (Again)

After EPO Sanctions Against IP Kat (Censorship of More Than 10,000 Articles) Even Merpel Throws in the Towel

=> 7 After EPO Sanctions Against IP Kat (Censorship of More Than 10,000 Articles) Even Merpel Throws in the Towel

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink > Image: Mail

 Send this to a friend

=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend


=> Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2022/11/22/epo-censors-critics
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini;lang=en-GB
Capsule Response Time
279.156565 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
5.344652 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).