This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2020/09/28/non-denying-and-false-denials/.

● 09.28.20

●● Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never Denied His Connections to MIT Through Jeffrey Epstein)

Posted in Bill Gates, Deception at 2:38 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

One can always blame the spokespeople for ‘misrepresentation’ if the statements are later proven to be false (but not falsified)

Summary: Big liars lie shamelessly; the biggest liars lie through proxies and today we examine the evasive tactics of Bill Gates and his associates (who were closely connected to Jeffrey Epstein but refuse to even talk about that, except indirectly)

THE BEST liars in the world may be politicians. One of them now holds the highest office in the United States, but he’s also a tax-evading rogue businessman (and “racist mobster” according to his own lawyer). There are other rogue businessmen, but they’ve been better at bribing publishers all around the world to manufacture a new and ‘clean’ identity for themselves.

=> ↺ tax-evading

Let’s use an example; the following article, for instance, was backed by original E-mails from MIT.

=> ↺ article

Says it all.

“He comes from a ‘lawyering’ family (his mentor/father recently died), so he knows how to lie or how to refuse answering questions (the deposition tapes are full of examples of that).”Bill Gates never denied it. His anonymous spokespeople, however, denied it (and MIT conveniently took that at face value). Why could he not deny it himself (directly)? The indirection is a layer of obfuscation, disclaiming liability. He comes from a ‘lawyering’ family (his mentor/father recently died), so he knows how to lie or how to refuse answering questions (the deposition tapes are full of examples of that). When one is deposed one cannot ‘speak’ through proxies; notice the many awkward silences below; there are other evasive tactics he shamelessly used back then.

=> MIT conveniently took that at face value

http://techrights.org/videos/gates-deposition.webm

Regarding the above article, when a high-profile critic of Gates’ meddling in education (for profiteering purposes) mentioned it someone soon commented:

=> ↺ mentioned

The latest expose is that Bill Gates rode on Epstein’s plan, “The Lolita Express” (Epstein’s nickname … talking about hiding in plain sight.)

… and this was AFTER very Epstein’s very public and widely known conviction for child molestation (so none of that, “Had I only known, I never would have blah-blah-blah … ” baloney is gonna fly in this circumstance … link to article BELOW).

.. and both Gates and his spokespeople are refusing to comment or answer any questions on this revelations. (Hey, wouldn’t you if you were in that situation?)

To this very day (more than a year later) Gates never denied it. But the media somehow ‘lost interest’ and is instead characterising Gates as the man looking to save the world from a virus. If OJ (Simpson) could walk away free, why can’t those other monsters and mobsters remove themselves from 'pesky' journalists? They can afford even better lawyers than OJ. As the saying goes, “there’s always a way…” █

=> 'pesky' journalists

“The Lolita Express” passengers log:

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend

=> Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.