This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2019/09/08/justice-lost-in-swisspost/.
Posted in Courtroom, Europe, Law at 10:25 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: An important case/appeal regarding the European Patent Office (EPO) seems to be eternally delayed, draining money and wasting time almost indefinitely
THE EPO fights its own staff whilst apparently outsourcing their jobs. The media doesn't want to talk about it. That means that EPO management needs pretexts for firing people, claiming they’re offenders, incompetent etc. Severance pay can be impacted by that kind of pretext. António Campinos does it perhaps more than the person who put him in charge (he has outsourcing experience from EUIPO) and this will likely worsen over time (if the endgame is complete outsourcing).
=> apparently outsourcing their jobs | media doesn't want to talk about it | ↺ António Campinos | ↺ person who put him in charge | has outsourcing experience | ↺ EUIPO
“It’s far from over and it implicates even the very top position (President) of the EPO.”In Koch v EPO [1, 2], which we’ve studied lately, there are some new developments. It’s interesting not only because details are publicly available* but because it concerns an aggrieved staff representative with disability attributed to the job at the EPO (related to the unjust dismissal). It’s far from over and it implicates even the very top position (President) of the EPO. We’ll probably revisit this case every now and then.
Here’s the latest:
Swiss post, the partner of PostNL through which I sent my registered parcel comprising my reply in re AT 5-4384, attempted to deliver this parcel with track&trace code CC061617661NL on 28-8-2019 at 7:41 hours, when nobody was present at the Tribunal's Registry to receive it.
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 3, 2019
How can Swiss post @swisspost deliver registered mail to a public institution like the Tribunal at a time at which nobody is present there? Earlier there was a 2nd attempt of delivery, why has that changed, and since when? https://t.co/qFFc8um6XL
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 3, 2019
https://twitter.com/AnetteKoch/status/1168896759902429186
There have been delays of my parcels to the Tribunal and lost parcels also in the past (partly restituted by @PostNL), yet, before this incident, parcels were offered to the Tribunal by Swiss Post @swisspost more than once, if they had been delivered too early in the morning.
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 3, 2019
https://twitter.com/AnetteKoch/status/1168907490391666690
Please do this ASAP to avoid that my parcel is unduly returned to me or even destroyed, due to wrong delivery @swisspost https://t.co/jKl0NEfgjJ
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 3, 2019
https://twitter.com/AnetteKoch/status/1168939540729532416
Any progress on this? @swisspost pic.twitter.com/JNDcmybCPy
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 4, 2019
From the attached extract from your website it is clear that you have wrongly delivered my parcel to the UN instead of the Admin. Tribunal of the ILO – I just sent you proof (in your messages) that it was correctly addressed. Pls inform the UN accordingly… @swisspost @PostNL https://t.co/4NbhMnqorn pic.twitter.com/Dly67H3H7H
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 4, 2019
https://twitter.com/AnetteKoch/status/1169179509767245824
My parcel sent via @PostNL from The Netherlands with code CC061617661NL addressed to the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO in 1211 Geneva 22 was wrongly delivered to the United Nations @UN by @swisspost on 28-8-2019 (below)- could it pls be transferred to the rightful recipient. pic.twitter.com/QSytBo8LYV
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 4, 2019
The ramification of this failure to deliver would be devastating to justice and, as we shall cover in later articles, we already know they use all sorts of tricks to manipulate and procrastinate the case (or send it ‘back’ to the EPO). They hope that complainants will simply run out of patience (and/or money).
The significance of this case will become more apparent over time. More information is becoming available and it serves to show ILO dysfunction as well as EPO misconduct. █ ______* The EPO’s staff, including SUEPO (the union), is aware of this case. Moreover, the Tribunal’s Jurisprudence is public, for instance, Judgments no. 3785, 3694 and 4131 (see triblex data base).
=> ↺ ILO | ↺ see triblex data base
Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink Send this to a friend
=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend
=> Techrights
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.
text/gemini;lang=en-GBThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).