This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2017/01/18/cant-properly-examine-at-epo/.
Posted in Europe, Patents, Rumour at 7:43 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Pressure to grant rather than properly examine dooms the core function of the Office
Summary: Whenever Battistelli brags about patent quality he may be consciously and deliberately lying through his teeth if the latest rumours are correct
EARLIER this week we saw rumours about the EPO‘s battle at the top — something we had already become aware of last month. It’s hardly surprising; there is a somewhat of a blame game.
=> rumours | ↺ EPO | we had already become aware of last month
“Some say that the final straw was the most known symptom of the dropping patent quality, the famous patent on the ‘hairdressing container’.” –Anonymous“There are several rumours about the reasons for VP1′s resignation,” told us a source about Battistelli’s Vice-President Mini Minion (Minnoye), “but nothing is confirmed. One of the rumours says that VP1 Minnoye is the scapegoat for the low patent quality, which has even been criticised by some delegations. Some say that the final straw was the most known symptom of the dropping patent quality, the famous patent on the ‘hairdressing container’.” (mentioned here back in November)
=> mentioned here back in November
Either way, this serves to reinforce our claims that EPO management is aware of the decline in quality and is thus repeatedly lying about it. “The departure of private Minnoye further weakens the president,” our source told us, “since the VPs are appointed by the Council. They can now choose a VP1 to obtain more control over the Office.” █
Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink Send this to a friend
=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend
=> Techrights
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.
text/gemini;lang=en-GB
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).