This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2010/07/22/skepticism-of-patents/.

● 07.22.10

●● Patent Trolls Have a Field Day; University of San Diego/UC Berkeley Study Questions Patenting

Posted in America, Europe, Law, Patents at 5:25 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: As another bunch of patent trolls shows its parasitic nature, a study is released to show scepticism of patents amongst actual young businesses (not well-established monopolies)

Patent trolls — can’t live with them, can’t… well, that’s about it actually. A few days ago we mentioned the bogus company which decided to troll everyone who posts press releases. TechDirt puts it succinctly and offers decent interpretation of the case. [original source]

=> ↺ puts it succinctly | ↺ original source

Law.com has an article highlighting how incredibly devastating a bogus patent infringement lawsuit can be to small businesses. In this case, someone hiding behind a series of shell companies is using a ridiculously laughable patent that appears to cover the concept of putting press releases online (6,370,535) and suing a bunch of companies that do exactly that. The article highlights the head of one tiny company — which, it should be noted, has been in business and doing the same thing since before the patent application was filed — who is debating whether he should go without a salary or company profits for three years to fight this, or just pay up. It’s really a sickening display of how patents are used to seriously harm small businesses.

According to this report just found by Glyn Moody, over 30 companies have also just been sued for daring to remove SPAM.

=> ↺ this report

A Texas company called InNova is suing 36 companies – including Google, Yahoo, Apple, Dell, AOL, Bank of America, RIM and 29 others saying it that all of these companies are infringing on InNova’s patent for – get this – email spam filtering.

Unless Texas does something to change its status as patent trolls haven, lawsuits like this one will continue to harm its reputation. By extension, this is the type of legal action that leads people to saying, “only in America…”

Software patents, frivolous patent lawsuits, and especially patent trolls seem to be phenomena that plague the United States more than any other country. In the EU, for example, it is sometimes being said that patent trolls don’t exist (but few do exist and we gave examples before). Pamela Samuelson and Ted Sichelman have just published their Californian study which is more of a survey that they published in O’Reilly Radar and also at Patently-O [1, 2, 3].

=> ↺ O’Reilly Radar | ↺ 1 | ↺ 2 | ↺ 3

To summarise:

More than 1,300 high technology entrepreneurs in the software, biotechnology, medical devices, and computer hardware fields filled out the Berkeley Patent Survey. All of these firms had been started no more than ten years before the survey was conducted. We drew our sample from a general population of software firms registered with Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) and from the VentureXpert (VX) database that has a rich data set on venture-backed startups. (Just over 500 of the survey respondents were D&B firms; just under 200 were VX firms.)

Here are some of the questions and issues they explored:

Why do entrepreneurs and startup companies file for patents? Why not? How often do startups acquire patents from others? How important are patents in fostering innovation at startups? In helping them raise financing? In providing leverage in cross-licensing negotiations? Are entrepreneurs and startups subject to patent thickets?

Glyn Moody found this new item from IP Watch. It indicates that “IPR rights was no incentive,” at least according to one person who deals with the field of biology.

=> ↺ this new item

Some experts in Europe are coming to agreement that a tipping point might have been reached with regard to biological patents.[...]“We noted that IPR rights was no incentive,” said Pelegrina. Instead, feeding the community and adapting seeds to climate change are important motivations. She concluded that the current seed policies imported from industrialised countries do not fit the highly dynamic development of breeding in local communities.

The merits of patents depend on propaganda that emphasises just one side of the scale and ignores all the drawbacks. What the world needs now is balance. Reform is necessary. █

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend


=> Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2010/07/22/skepticism-of-patents
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini;lang=en-GB
Capsule Response Time
280.284961 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
1.417552 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).