This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2010/06/29/salesforce-vs-dot-net/.
Posted in Free/Libre Software, Google, Java, Microsoft, Mono, Oracle, Patents at 4:38 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Microsoft’s imitation of Java is mentioned by Salesforce in its counter lawsuit; more news about the MPEG-LA threat
WE ALREADY know that Microsoft has .NET patents which it uses to keep Mono at bay. But we’ve just found an interesting observation about the Salesforce case [1, 2], which is still in some headlines:
=> uses to keep Mono at bay | ↺ an interesting observation | 1 | 2 | ↺ still in some headlines
The complained mentioned .NET platform and SharePoint collaboration software violates Salesforce.com patents.
Oracle’s Java patents are also a problem to .NET, but what makes Mono and Moonlight rather unique is that they are encumbered by patents owned by the company which actively attacks GNU/Linux with patents. What we are trying to say is, software patents in general are a problem, but those who actually use them against GNU/Linux are so far Apple, Microsoft, and the patent troll called Acacia, which has Microsoft connections.
=> ↺ Mono | ↺ Moonlight | ↺ Acacia
“It’s a fine example of the need for immediate reform (Bilski wasn’t it).”Just looking at some new press releases, we realise that software patents are not just a “Microsoft thing” (or Apple or IBM for that matter). Small companies too are showing them off in press releases [1, 2], but they never attack GNU/Linux. They have no interest in doing this because they don’t defend a monopoly with profitable products like Windows.
On the other hand, large companies use software patents to build fences around existing monopolies. TechDirt comments on the Amazon patent we mentioned a day ago. It’s a fine example of the need for immediate reform (Bilski wasn't it).
=> ↺ the Amazon patent | mentioned a day ago | wasn't
There is one last item regarding MPEG-LA, which we wrote about in:
Canonical Needs to Tell Ubuntu Users How Much It Paid MPEG-LA for Patent ‘Protection’Microsoft and MPEG-LA Called “Patent Trolls”, Antitrust Complaint FiledPatent Troll (MPEG-LA) May Own Your Personal/Family VideosAlexandre Oliva Explains Why the Patent Troll Larry Horn (MPEG Cartel) is Bluffing“We’re in the Era of Digital Video, and It’s a Mess,” –Steve Jobs, MPEG-LA Proponent/LobbyistSimon Phipps: “MPEG-LA is a Parasite Using Standards Bodies as Its Host, Whether They Want it or Not.” (and a Rant About Banshee/Mono)
FFmpeg writes about its newly-added VP8 support:
=> ↺ its newly-added VP8 support
Now that the hype is over, let’s talk the real deal. How good is Google’s VP8 video codec? Since “multiple independent implementations help a standard mature quicker and become more useful to its users”, me and others (David for the decoder core and PPC optimizations, Jason for x86 optimizations) decided that we should implement a native VP8 decoder in FFmpeg.
As Slashdot points out:
=> ↺ points out
They were able to keep the line-count low by relying on heavy reuse from the existing H.264 codebase.
The thing is, encoding with matrices and compression is a mathematical process. To allow a monopoly on such a thing is to grant exclusionary rights on natural, logical things. The FFII’s president considers this to be a pretext for lawsuit, but what we understand is that VP8 shrewdly evaded being classified as fulfilling all the conditions in patents held by MPEG-LA (which typically extorts companies using peripheral pressure). █
Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink Send this to a friend
=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend
=> Techrights
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.
text/gemini;lang=en-GBThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).