This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2009/09/22/alan-cox-on-dotnet-linux/.

● 09.22.09

●● Alan Cox in 2002: “Microsoft Has Publicly Stated That it Has Patents on Critical Parts of .NET and Will Enforce Them”

Posted in GNU/Linux, Interview, Java, Kernel, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Patents at 6:43 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Memorable and foresighted words from one of the top Linux developers

A FEW MONTHS ago Microsoft confirmed Alan's statements, which can be found in this interview with Slashdot that contains a lot more:

=> Microsoft confirmed Alan's statements | ↺ this interview with Slashdot

What are your feelings on Microsoft’s .NET and any initiatives to make the technology work on Linux?Alan [Cox]: Microsoft has publically stated that it has patents on critical parts of .NET and will enforce them. If you think that .NET is a good idea, or cloning .NET is a good idea, remember you won’t have a US market unless they find you amusing enough to allow to live on. And if you think Microsoft can be trusted on this look at their recent activities against Samba. The system itself is mildly interesting as a technology. Its yet another virtual machine, roughly equivalent to picojava in capabilities. It has an interesting way to self generate IDL, but one which their own papers say cannot represent all programming languages. The more dangerous parts of all this are not so much .NET but chunks of the model that not only the .NET product and the Java standards rely on. Things like xmlrpc, soap and the stuff on top of them are designed to “interwork through firewalls”. A better phrase would be “go through the firewall like a knife through butter in a way that prevents the companies involved monitoring the activity”.

In summary, Microsoft’s .NET is a legal threat, it is just an imitation of Java, and it is a security issue. █

=> it is a security issue

Related posts that mention Alan Cox:

GPLv3 Resolves the Apache Compatibility Peril, Gets Alan Cox’s ApprovalQuick Mention: Alan Cox on Software Patents, Standards and BeyondQuick Mention: Linus Torvalds “Really Don’t Know” About the Legal IssuesResponses to GNOME Foundation’s OOXML StatementFrance Gets It Wrong on GNU/LinuxNew Linus Torvalds Interview Covers the Novell Issue, AgainYou Lose, You LieLinus Torvalds Has No “Hugely Strong Opinion” on Cross-licensing Deals (Updated)Support for GPLv3 Keeps Growing with Apache Foundation Co-Founder’s NodGPLv3 Released Today, Early Support Already Gained (Updatedx2)The Free Software Foundation Explains Why Novell is off the GPLv3 HookIs the Linux Kernel Approaching Acceptance of GPLv3?Novell and Xandros Hit by the GPL CluebatMicrosoft ‘Study’ Smears GPLv3 (Updated)Google Likes GPLv3, Microsoft Hates GPLv3, Eben Moglen Interview on GPLv3How’s That GPLv3 Coming Along?

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend

=> Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.