This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2009/08/06/msft-avoidance-of-a-gpl-lawsuit/.

● 08.06.09

●● Sun’s Chief Open Source Officer: Microsoft’s Linux Code Apparently About Avoidance of a GPL Lawsuit

Posted in Courtroom, Free/Libre Software, GNU/Linux, GPL, Kernel, Law, SUN at 5:31 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Microsoft’s true attitude towards the GPL is still obvious to many

SIMON PHIPPS, pointing to this summary of issues that we covered here a lot recently [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], writes very succinctly about Microsoft’s loadable module for Linux: “There had to be a reason beyond goodwill, and it seems that reason was avoidance of a lawsuit.“

=> ↺ this summary | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ↺ writes very succinctly about Microsoft’s loadable module for Linux

“Microsoft’s attitude towards the GPL may only change due to misery, due to lack of other options.”Microsoft did not release something under the GPL out of choice; rather, it was due to lack of choice. Here is what Microsoft’s Vice President Brian Roberts said some years ago: “For every acquisition, we identify very early what the key value drivers are. And we will design our due-diligence process and integration approach around these drivers. If we surface concerns that cannot be mitigated by a deal structure or an integration approach, we will part paths. And there are many examples of issues that can become deal killers. It may be our assessment of the culture. Maybe the talent is not as good as we’d hoped as we get to meet more of the team. The code quality could be poor, or worse, the code may be subject to the General Public License (GPL) often used for distribution of open source software.”

=> ↺ Microsoft’s Vice President Brian Roberts said some years ago

As Jason puts it, “I just like the idea that Microsoft considers GPL code “worse” than poor quality code.”

=> ↺ Jason puts it

Yes, Microsoft’s attitude towards the GPL may only change due to misery, due to lack of other options. Microsoft is still trying to sneakily substitute the GPL (it hopes to destroy it this way). And then the company calls its opponents “hateful” or “intolerant”. █

=> trying to sneakily substitute the GPL

“The true hypocrite is the one who ceases to perceive his deception, the one who lies with sincerity.”

–Andre Gide

Related posts:

Microsoft’s Open Source XenophobiaIs Microsoft Embracing Open Source? Like a Python Embraces a GazelleMore Cost Cutting and Device Xenophobia at MicrosoftMicrosoft Attacks, Then Tries to Hijack Free SoftwareUse of False Promises to Attract Free Software DevelopersMicrosoft Makes New Friends in Open Source World — for Windows, .NET, SilverlightMicroFOSS and Other Oxymorons: How Can Anyone Be So Gullible?At Novell, Software Development is Microsoft Cloning (MicroFOSS)A Quick Look at More Reactions to Microsoft’s TaxoperabilityBill Gates Ridicules the GPL While Novell Mops Up with Software PatentsMicrosoft Latest Incursions and Subversion of Open SourceA Quick Look at Microsoft Latest strategy Against GNU/LinuxMicrosoft Redefines “Cross-platform”: Mac + Win32Microsoft Introduces New Taxoperability Program

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend


=> Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2009/08/06/msft-avoidance-of-a-gpl-lawsuit
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini;lang=en-GB
Capsule Response Time
283.667517 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
1.850686 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).