This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2009/03/08/magic-quadrant-codie-and-spin/.
Posted in Deception, Fraud, Marketing, Microsoft, Novell at 8:34 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Justification of doubts about Novell awards; lack of integrity in lack of transparency
EARLIER THIS YEAR we wrote about conflicts of interests in media-granted awards, which are naturally susceptible and sensitive to bribery. We used Novell as an example. In practical terms, it’s mostly the same when it comes to analysts such as the Gartner Group (with hard evidence) and all sorts of surveys and questionnaires.
=> conflicts of interests in media-granted awards | same when it comes to analysts | the Gartner Group | hard | evidence | all sorts of surveys | questionnaires
It is therefore quite reasonable that we observe with great suspicion the claims from Novell’s PR blog that they were included in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant — whatever it actually means.
=> ↺ claims from Novell’s PR blog
In September 2008, Novell SecureLogin was positioned in the leaders quadrant of Gartner, Inc.’s, Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Single Sign-On by Gregg Kreizman.
But we already known that Gartner is corruptible [1, 2]. That’s just how it makes money, so what does this mean anyway? Microsoft itself is joking about this, saying that “analysts sell out – that’s their business model.” Moreover, brags Microsoft, it is easy to buy their opinions.
=> 1 | 2 | saying | it is easy to buy their opinions
Apart from the above PR from Novell came this one as well (both appearing last week):
On the heels of the Oscars, the Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA) has just announced the finalists for the 2009 CODiE awards and Novell ZENworks solutions have received two nominations.[...]And in the category of Best Security Solution is ZENworks Endpoint Security Management, which protects the network against potential security breaches, data leaks and threats by enforcing encryption policies on the desktop.
Who runs these CODiE awards anyway? We decided to check:
Registrant: Make this info private
Software & Information Industry Association
1090 Vermont Ave, NW
6th floor
Washington, DC 20005
US
Administrative Contact :
Anglin, Delroy
danglin@SIIA.NET
1090 Vermont Avenue
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20005
US
Phone: 202-289-7442
Fax: (202) 223-8756
Technical Contact :
Network Solutions, LLC.
customerservice@networksolutions.com
13861 Sunrise Valley Drive
Herndon, VA 20171
US
Phone: 1-888-642-9675
Fax: 571-434-4620
What is the business model of the CODiE awards? What are the criteria for nomination, selection and who is voting anyway? How is it being policed against abuse? Microsoft, for example, is notorious for rigging votes using employees or hired guns, e.g. [1, 2].
=> is notorious for rigging votes | 1 | 2
One of our readers sent us a good pointer a couple of days ago. It ascends to a more political level where the ‘open source’ approach (transparency) can combat this issue of mistrust.
=> ↺ more political level where the ‘open source’ approach (transparency)
I spent the weekend in DC at TransparencyCamp, an event modeled after BarCamp focused on government transparency and open access to sources of federal data (largely through APIs and web services). Down the street, a social-media savvy conference called PowerShift convened over 12,000 of the nation’s youth to march on Congress to have their concerns about the environment heard. They were largely brought together on social networks.
It’s good reading overall and another one that has just been published is this one from PR Watch:
Corporations wanting help in advancing their agendas often turn to think tanks. In addition to providing the appearance of independent support for corporate policies, think tanks combine a scholarly image with expertise at how to play the media and policymakers alike.
Microsoft has used the Alexis de Toqueville Institute against Linux and it employs lobbying arms to poison professional panels that discuss Free/open source software. They even seem to be setting up fake grassroots sites (still).
=> Alexis de Toqueville Institute against Linux | poison professional panels that discuss Free/open source software | setting up fake grassroots sites
All of these issues ought to become common knowledge which is vital. Sadly, however, these realities sometimes surprise people. Is this a classic case of imposed ignorance? █
There is no money in objective opinions
Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink Send this to a friend
=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend
=> Techrights
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.
text/gemini;lang=en-GBThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).