This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2009/02/16/gartner-fortify-attack-foss/.

● 02.16.09

●● Where Do Gartner’s and Fortify’s Attacks on Free Software Come From?

Posted in Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Security at 3:59 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Analysts sell out – that’s their business model… But they are very concerned that they never look like they are selling out, so that makes them very prickly to work with.”

–Microsoft, internal document [PDF]

WE RECENTLY showed Microsoft’s attacks on NC, as demonstrated very clearly using internal communication. This was practically done by the Gartner Group at Microsoft's behest and with Microsoft’s invocation.

=> practically done by the Gartner Group at Microsoft's behest

There are many other such cases where Microsoft uses the Gartner Group against Microsoft’s rivals (including GNU/Linux), typically using Microsoft funding. Gartner also negotiates its coverage of Microsoft products... with Microsoft. We gave plenty of examples like these before, but the following new example sure resembles the group’s attack on NC, which is a paradigm shift (away from the ‘desktop’) that Microsoft simply cannot allow. Is the following man yet another ‘attack dog’ of Microsoft?

=> including GNU/Linux | negotiates its coverage of Microsoft products... with Microsoft | ↺ new example

Analyst: SaaS and open source ‘won’t happen’ in 2009Software as a service, the model by which software is hosted and delivered over the network, “will not happen” in 2009, according to Gartner research director, Andrew Rowsell-Jones.

Was this opinion bought? Did he truly believe what he said with a subconscious bias?

Another known ‘attack dog’ of Microsoft is Fortify, a Microsoft ally that’s currently attacking messengers who promote Free software, including the conservative party in Great Britain.

=> a Microsoft ally | including the conservative party in Great Britain

Microsoft’s past talking point was that Free software is more expensive, but having realised that the public no longer buys this FUD, the company and its partners proceeded to attacking using "security" as ammunition, not “cost”. Here is some more analysis which contradicts the latest FUD:

=> past talking point | attacking using "security" as ammunition | ↺ more analysis which contradicts the latest FUD

First, Conservative shadow chancellor George Osborne no less put out another chapter in his tech emerging manifesto, extolling the wonder of open source and berating the Government for its inability to see the light. His job is to berate governments, which tend to be easy targets, and open source software makes a hard bat.That, predictably, prompted one vendor with an axe to sharpen, Fortify Software, to remind the media, to remind the media of a report released last July by the company that found security patching fault in 11 Java packages. Disclaimer: Fortify sells software assurance products.Inevitably, a number of sources have slated Fortify in turn, and one, Coverity, has even come up – hey presto! – with its own report showing that, on the contrary, open source programs had fewer flaws than closed source, not more.

It sure seems as though Fortify was lying or bending truths to promote itself and vilify its ally’s nightmare. It’s easy to make up supportive numbers while hiding the rest [1, 2, 3]. █

=> 1 | 2 | 3

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend

=> Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.