This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2008/11/21/portugal-browser-discrimination/.
Posted in Europe, Interoperability, Standard at 12:56 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
DEAR Minister of Education and esteemed Secretary of State and Education and Deputy Secretary of State for Education;
After reading an article [1] published on the online edition of the newspaper “O Público” on the alleged illegality of the electronic records of the individual objectives of teachers, I was curious about the platform and decided to visit it, even though I’m not a teacher. Finding the address was relatively easy, but I can’t say the same about the access to it.
When I tried to visit the site, I encountered an error message [2] due to the browser I was using. However, the browser I use is called Icecat, now in version 3.0.4, and as it is a clone of Firefox 3.0.4; between Icecat and Firefox, besides the name, there is very little difference, and a site that is shown correctly in one is shown correctly on the other. I’m using this browser on distribution of GNU/Linux called gNewSense.
“Finding the address was relatively easy, but I can’t say the same about the access to it.”The error message I mentioned suggested the use of Internet Explorer and said that it is used ‘by more than 90% of the Internet users’. This suggestion leaves me amazed because I can’t understand how a public institution may suggest dictatorware – it should be read, proprietary/harmful software, contrary to all democratic values. The amazement is greater with the lie that follows the suggestion: the use of the browser ‘by over 90% of Internet users’. Please bare in mind that this proprietary browser, according to a report [3] of Xiti Monitor, is only used by 60% of Europeans – a number that continues to shrink every month that passes.
The same error message is also suggested when using Mozilla, an ‘Internet suite of excellence’. The problem is that this software is now called SeaMonkey and is no longer under the jurisdiction of the Mozilla Foundation (despite they give some support to the legal level of this project) as you can verify when you click the link [4] of the error page that was created for the Multi Platforma DRGHE. It would be nice if these little details were checked before putting the site online. The fact that something as trivial as this was not done makes me think that other details were also left unchecked in this platform.
Another strange… suggestion is Netscape, a browser that, curiously, had its development discontinued a few months ago. Its use could jeopardize the security of the user, such as using the proprietary browser suggested in the beginning of the error message.
Having that said, I’d like to thank you for treating me like a second class citizen. It is “good” to know that only those who use certain applications can access some sites of the government, and that interoperability, so widely recommended by the European Union, is a concept unknown to the people who develop and/or allow these web applications.
Sincerely; Bruno Miguel
____ [1] http://ultimahora.publico.clix.pt/noticia.aspx?id=1350642&idCanal=58 [2] https://concurso.dgrhe.min-edu.pt/Definicao… [3] http://www.xitimonitor.com/en-us/browsers-barometer/… [4] http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/
=> ↺ http://ultimahora.publico.clix.pt/noticia.aspx?id=1350642&idCanal=58 | ↺ https://concurso.dgrhe.min-edu.pt/Definicao… | ↺ http://www.xitimonitor.com/en-us/browsers-barometer/… | ↺ http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/
Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink Send this to a friend
=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend
=> Techrights
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.
text/gemini;lang=en-GBThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).