This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2007/09/30/gplv3-gplv2-fud-rebuttal/.
Posted in FUD, GPL, Microsoft at 2:33 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
One of the most effective ways to combat patent infringement accusations is to upgrade projects to the GNU GPLv3.
Palamida’s research on GPLv3 adoption continues to fascinate, and while there are doubters of their methods, these methods can trivially be defended. Under the premise that projects do not upgrade the licence until the next release, GPLv3 can, in some cases, be assumed. As such, GPLv3 adoption is not as slow as the press would have you believe. Au contraire — GPLv3 is being adopted quickly, unlike Windows Vista. Palamida lists almost 1,000 GPLv3-adopting projects.
=> ↺ can trivially be defended | ↺ being adopted quickly
Linux-Watch has just delivered a new whitepaper that explains the differences between GPLv2 and GPLv3.
Do you find open source licenses a puzzle? Does reading stories about the legal side of open source give you the heebie-jeebies? If so, then we have the document for you.
Hopefully, such papers will help developers wash away the effects of disinformation, which was systematically spread by Microsoft’s own people, its proxies, its lobbyists, paid-for ‘studies’, hired ‘researchers’, and maybe even Wikipedia edits. To put it bluntly, if one searches the Web for information on GPLv3, there will be a lot of garbage (placements and other brainwash) that deceives one’s mind.
Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink Send this to a friend
=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend
=> Techrights
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.
text/gemini;lang=en-GBThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).