This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2007/05/09/interoperability-shouldnt-require-an-agreement/.

● 05.09.07

●● Interoperability Shouldn’t Require an Agreement

Posted in Deals, Deception, Microsoft, Novell, Red Hat, Standard, Windows at 7:35 pm by Shane Coyle

Open Standards Will Do Just Fine, Thank You

On the heels of the confirmation by Novell’s Justin Steinman that the Microvell deal does indeed include a patent license, despite earlier denials, Red Hat has confirmed that they continue to hold conversations with Microsoft regarding improved interoperability between Windows and Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

=> ↺ confirmation by Novell’s Justin Steinman that the Microvell deal does indeed include a patent license, despite earlier denials | ↺ continue to hold conversations with Microsoft

Red Hat, however, has no interest in signing any deal which will include closed APIs, and is unlikely interested in licensing any Microsoft intellectual property in order to do so.

Red Hat will only sign an interoperability agreement with Microsoft if it is based entirely on open standards, the company’s executive vice president of Engineering Paul Cormier told vnunet.com.
“Interoperability done on closed APIs isn’t interoperability,” Cormier said.
“We’ll never do interoperability based on closed APIs.”

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend


=> Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2007/05/09/interoperability-shouldnt-require-an-agreement
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini;lang=en-GB
Capsule Response Time
277.623466 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
0.633583 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).