This page permanently redirects to gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2007/01/19/groklaw-on-open-xml/.
Posted in Formats, Novell, Office Suites, Open XML, OpenDocument, Standard at 9:15 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
This debate has been covered extensively before. However, if you are still unconvinced that Microsoft’s Open XML (OOXML) is nothing but a proprietary format in disguise, have a look at the lastest from Groklaw. This blog item, which equates this ‘standard’ to a “monopoly enabler”, has even gotten Bob Sutor’s attention.
=> ↺ covered extensively before | ↺ have a look at the lastest from Groklaw | ↺ gotten Bob Sutor’s attention
…I learned this week that despite Microsoft’s promises of a new openness and its assertions regarding interoperability for its OOXML (formerly known as OpenXML and also known as EOOXML) and despite having offered it as a standard, it seems that it’s another case of promises, promises. From what I’ve been reading, which I’ll share with you, I think it’s time to ask ourselves some serious questions: does OOXML really qualify as a standard? Or is it yet another monopoly-enabler in the guise of a standard?
Sadly, Novell has given Microsoft’s plan some credence by saying it would offer OOXML support.
=> ↺ would offer OOXML support
Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink Send this to a friend
=> Permalink | ↺ Send this to a friend
=> Techrights
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.
text/gemini;lang=en-GB
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).