An economic lesson on umemployment

Anyway, by some mysterious process, we've arrived at a recession level of unemployment that's lower than the expansion level of five years ago. Pretty neat stuff. Which only leaves us one question:
Where the hell's my job

Via InstaPundit.Com, [1] Megan McArdle on unemployment [2]

Rob [3] and I were talking about unemployment the other day. I had remarked that economists (or business leaders, or both) had said that there is a minimum amount of unemployment that is needed to keep the economy working. At the time, we both theorized that it was the level required to keep those employed in line (the Cynical/Conspriatorial Theory).

The article above (mediumish length, but worth it) goes into detail about how this minimum level of unemployment to sustain our economy comes (or came) about. It's less a conspriacy and more a way companies find the maximum profit given the rules of the game.

=> [1] http://www.instapundit.com/ | [2] http://www.janegalt.net/2002_03_10_janegalt_archive.html#75002566 | [3] http://www.tragic-smurfs.com/

=> Gemini Mention this post | Contact the author

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://gemini.conman.org/boston/2002/03/13.1
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
562.878406 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
0.411256 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).