i currently have an owner/possession power dynamic with one of my partners. In the past, i had an owner/property dynamic with a former partner (now friend), and as a part of the dynamic, we created a ‘title deed’: a ‘contract’ (not, of course, intended to be an actual legal document) outlining what was involved in my ownership of her. Here's the text of it, reproduced here with her permission, references to her name replaced with ‘X’:
=> ===
Preamble
This document refers to relationship arrangements between [redacted] (hereafter, ‘Alexis’) and [redacted] (hereafter, ‘X’).
Alexis' ownership of X is based on ongoing mutual informed consent, in the context of Risk-Aware Consensual Kink. Nothing in this Title Deed should be interpreted otherwise.
In cases where later (i.e. higher-numbered) rules conflict with earlier (i.e. lower-numbered) rules, earlier rules take precedence.
Definitions
The phrase “care for” and its cognates are to be interpreted as meaning “acting so as to not cause a reduction in the quality of”.
Terms of ownership
Symbols of ownership
In-relationship structures
i. a regular time for extended VoIP-based interaction;
ii. Alexis developing sexual training schedules for X so as to improve her sexual capabilities as Alexis' property.
Review
Amendments
Dissolution
=> ===
We're both avid readers in general, and of SF in particular; the text:
In cases where later (i.e. higher-numbered) rules conflict with earlier (i.e. lower-numbered) rules, earlier rules take precedence.
was based on the structuring of Asimov's “Three Laws of Robotics”:
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.[a]
We made this document publicly available on X's blog, and got a lot of positive feedback about it. There was appreciation for the fact that we'd not taking a pro-forma approach, and had instead created something specific to our context; an appreciation that the well-being of the bottom was the highest priority; and an appreciation that, more generally, our contract placed more of an emphasis on the top's responsibilities and had less of a focus on all the bottom's obligations.
In a previous post, i wrote:
i'm all for using common kink aesthetics as part of your scenes/dynamics if that's what you actively want to do. But i don't want people to feel compelled to embody those aesthetics because “that's how to Do Kink”; because those are the only kink aesthetics that have ever been presented to them.
i feel this applies to many other areas of kink, and kink contracts are an example. To me, RACK is about finding what works for you: not about meeting others' expectations and demands of what they feel is The Way To Do Things, but about what brings you and your play partners joy and comfort and satisfaction and happiness.
☙
🏷 kink,sexuality
=> Glossary | Gemlog Home
☙
=> [a] Wikipedia: ‘Three Laws of Robotics’ This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini;lang=en_AU