=> Re: "Rationale FAQ" | In: s/Gemini
@stack
Or just use markdown, since you already need a library or two to do comms and crypto, and just disallow things you don't like.
4.4.5 answers exactly your question:
=> โ geminiprotocol.net/docs/faq-section-4.gmi
2024-10-07 ยท 3 months ago
=> ๐ stack ยท Oct 07 at 16:22:
@gentooshnik, I don't think it actually answers much if you read it carefully.
=> ๐ pista ยท Oct 22 at 16:47:
The lack of italic or oblique type is most frustrating
Italic type has been used for a long time to set off titles of works, whereas quotation marks identify the title of an article or section within a work. It also ruins the ability to set off foreign words within a body of type.
Italic can be swapped with underline, though I find it less aesthetically pleasing. But then... we don't have underline either.
I've found that missing feature a headache on many occasions since it's a part of type used to convey information as opposed to just calling attention. It makes it very annoying to reference other works.
=> ๐ s/Gemini | โ astrobotany.mozz.us/public/d042d6e56d684136ab0d07b128df0a50/m1
Rationale FAQ โ If it doesn't exist already it should be created. There's a discussion at [https link] and people ask lots of questions about Gemtext. Most of them are obvious from the Gemini core design principles but some are not. Here are a few: Why no inline semantic markup? Like etc. (Nobody actually misses things like fonts...
=> ๐ฌ Gentooshnik ยท 43 comments ยท 2024-10-05 ยท 3 months ago This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini; charset=utf-8